RE: BitShares Enterprise Alliance - Part 12 - The Godfather Shrugged
Totally understand your decision Stan and I support you. I found out about BitShares because of you and Michael Taggart. I watched a video and immediately started to buy in when the price was .37. I was completely green and a total newbie. Over time I have actively worked as a volunteer in the groups. I have created many videos and done my best to serve the community based on the greatest good for the greatest number. In that time I have made my own observations and I agree with you 100% there are those in the BitShares community that are anti-social personalities and or psychotic.
You can easily spot them as they attack those that are productive and trying to help. These same types are also usually guilty of the very things they are accusing others of doing and could be easily verified if one was to dig in to the skeletons.
BitShares has been around now for quite some time. Its not really flourished and prospered like it should have. One wonders why. That is because of the anti-social personalities that have been hard at work doing what they could to prevent BitShares form expanding.
They appear to be a "friend" or valid community member. They may in fact seem intelligent. But at the same time they are calculating destroying the community and its most productive members. They use carping criticism and covert hostility to mention just a few.
If it were not true then why is BitShares not within the top 10 market cap, with 100’s of businesses already utilising it. How is it that the fastest block chain in the world is so little valued.
Want to know why BitShares has not succeeded as it should?
- Research who has been around the longest. They have “helped” more than most why BitShares is not where it should be.
Statistics are made to go up and are made to go down. So if BitShares had statistics of success, measured by market cap, popularity, number of traders, liquidity etc and if these stats were low or were not where they should be in comparison to time then understand someone or someones were using their position, influence, voting power to thwart the progress of BitShares and to keep those statistics down.
- Research who is more anit-social than social. Who is mostly antagonistic toward their fellow community members.
- Research who seems to attack, undermine, productive terminals within the community.
- Research who tends to stop or vote against projects / WP’s that are for the greatest good and that would actual help the community.
Start doing that and you will discover that it actually comes down to just a few people. By percentage 2.5%. Generally most people try and do the right thing. But there are those who specialise in doing bad things.
By their actions you will know them.
Thanks again Stan for all that you do and will do for the community. I support you 100%
What are your thoughts on the other DEX platforms that are rolling out one after one. Do you have any concerns that Bitshares will just be one among the others?
That's always been recognized, but with the stuff we've got in the pipeline, we are in an excellent position.
View post on dMania
Blaming BitShares problems solely on anti-socialism sounds like total BS, tbh. Even if there are a few bad apples, which I am sure there are, that wouldn't hold back the strong community that alongside time build itself around it. The thing with the Blockchain industry is that it's still very new. Hype and promotion still play the greatest key beneficiaries when it comes to people investing, the one thing that BitShares lacks a great deal of. Due to it being totally decentralized, being far ahead of its time, the industry just needs time to catch up to it. I estimate this year to be the start of the turnaround, where people start to comprehend and realize what it's actually capable of, this astonishing piece of technology. EOS being a big play in all of this. In quietness businesses are already building around the BitShares blockchain, which (hopefully) will bring forth a chain reaction and move it forward...
...to the moon and beyond!
I agree, the issues with BitShares predate this latest turmoil. Lest I be labeled as one of those "anti-social personalities" please consider that much of the animosity concerning BitShares began long ago, and the community wasn't effective at countering the FUD and defending the BitShares name. That's on ALL of us in the BitShares community.
As I posted in Telegram, there have been poor decisions made over the course of this project that have infuriated previous BitShares "partners" (Stans looser definition of partner used here). I've heard a handful of people report they weren't paid for work agreed to, or were screwed over by a sudden shift without warning. Some issues were only discovered in the last quarter of 2017 related to the STEALTH effort Bytemaster was in charge of just before he left to work on steem.
I have been around since 2014, and although I can indeed be harsh at times in my criticism, I believe Graphene technology is the best there is in the crypto space right now. I am optimistic about EOS in that Bytemaster is now in a role he is excellent at, while others take the lead on UI/UX, PR, marketing and business development.
Spot on and thank you. Let's expose and weed out the traitors, one by one. I am going to post the steps again here because I believe it is so important if BitShares really wants to thrive. I myself and other organizations have used these very same steps to get rid of the scum that lies hidden, sabotaging while trying to appear "helpful".
Research who is more anit-social than social. Who is mostly antagonistic toward their fellow community members.
Research who seems to attack, undermine, productive terminals within the community.
Research who tends to stop or vote against projects / WP’s that are for the greatest good and that would actual help the community.
I appreciate your word and deep thought about Bitshares. We must expose the ones who are not happy with the success of others. Thanks for your valuable vocal against the negative charactors.
good post