Hi again Carlo, we have been reviewing your posts and have a few questions for you if you wouldnt mind answering them.
We notice that you present this supposedly original and unique articles and that at the end of them you insert "Source:xxxxx.com" which links to a page.

So 1) are you by any chance citing the whole site blockchain4innovation.it as your source or the page linked to?

2)If you are citing the whole site, that has hundreds if not thousands of articles, please know this is not acceptable, its as if I were to cite, say, the entire NewYorkTimes site or why not Google.com? Si capisci?

3)Now, if what you are citing as source is the particular page, the proper way to do it is inserting this text : "[Source/Fonte] (linktothepage)"
so that its clear that you are citing that page as the source and not the entire site.

4)If you are citing that particular page as source, then there is another problem, is this page the source of your whole article and you are just copypasting the content? Are you merely rephrasing the source? or is it the source only a part of it? If so, what part(s)?

As you might surmise, for example in this case, curators dont speak italian generally, so by going to the page they would be unable to see if the whole article or a part and what part was taken, so what you need to do is specify what parts you took from the source, you know as when in a university paper you quote something? with "" marks or the > markdown, in this way you would make clear what you took from the source, and what is your original content.

Things as they stand your method of sourcing is extremely ambiguous and doesnt allow the viewers and curators readily know what is your original content and what is copypaste from the source or rephrased from the source.

Thank you for your attention.