Technology blockchain in political elections

In March of this year, in the elections of Sierra Leone, the Swiss company of technology Now used technology blockchain to observe and to audit part of the results of the elections in the capital. This country is part of a region where several dubious elections have already taken place and, precisely because of this, blockchain and the transparency resulting from its use arouse a great deal of anxiety about the potential. The calculation computed by the company was not considered in the official count, the system was placed only in operational tests. How could this work?

In the case of Sierra Leone, voting was held in ballot box ballots, and in real time a restricted team monitored the votes in real time, registering them in the blockchain. The nature of the blockchain is to record all user transactions - in this case, it registers the issuers and recipients of each vote, as well as any changes or moves made on them, and allows all actions to be tracked.

So, in addition to using blockchain to check vote counts, as tested by the Agora Now company in Sierra Leone, the main idea is that the entire election process be conducted through blockchain. Each candidate would have a sort of receptacle to where each voter, as a user of the system, could transfer his only asset that, in the case, would be the vote.

By accessing blockchain electoral system software with a digital certificate confirming their identity, voters can transfer their vote directly to the candidate of their choice without leaving home, on a secure and encrypted system, recording the history and allowing tracing through distributed network system, thus avoiding duplication of votes and other frauds.

The validation of any blockchain operation is performed by an immense network of computers with high encryption, and there is currently no technology capable of defrauding this system. A possible flaw in this model of election, however, is the possibility of violation of the secret ballot, since votes would leave the private apparatus of each voter from their digital certificate, and not from polling stations shared anonymously.

Many private institutions have already successfully adopted and carried out this model of computation and verification for their internal elections. Also in May 2018, the United States tested state blockchain state elections in West Virginia, especially aimed at facilitating the access of absent servicemen and their families to the exercise of their citizenship.

This system, therefore, allows citizens to rely on the legitimacy of the results of the elections, given their transparency, as well as promoting accessibility for people with mobility difficulties to polling places.

Several other states are conducting feasibility studies of the implementation of this system, including Brazil. In fact, there is a legislative idea for the adoption of blockchain for the Brazilian elections since 2016, with the idea that any citizen would be able to audit the elections in an instant. This idea, however, has not received sufficient support and has not yet progressed in our legislative system.

Source: https://portaldobitcoin.com