You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Pink Floyd with alternative on screen lyrics, regarding Steem. (oh , and some sheep)
Nothing like trying to extract rewards on a platform that you continue to bash, kinda like walking into a venue, taking a dump in the middle of it and saying "hope you enjoy it, now reward my contribution".
ah! so it has to be creative and non critical of the powers that be?
A little like soviet russia or rumania?
38 voted for, 1 voted against.
totalitarianism, anyone lol
Criticism of snowflake individuals = taking rewards given to them by non snowflakes/ people with sense of humor/irony
Gotcha!
.....this vid (and the downvoting penalization for being creative) highlights the exact problem of steemit - and why it will die.
Intelligent investors will stay the fuck away from a childish setup - while at the same time taking gullible sheep to the financial slaughter yard, with them.
A great system we have here!
lmao.
(the rewards are irrelevant to me, I just wanted to make a video.)
Have other stuff to do now- just popped on to see the (predictable) response.
...speak in a few days....
If rewards are irrelevant then why not exemplify it, do you not know that option exists? There's a difference between valid critique and bashing, you know, one is not based entirely on your theory/speculation..
And how exactly would that highlight the shit show that is steem?
durrr!
Bernie down voted my criticism of steem - after criticism of it himself.
Bernie is part of the system, and just creating drama in a sad attempt to garner interest in a continually failing platform.
Never expect a commie to come up with any positive actions - it's not in there nature.
Negativity and trying to control is all they know.
As much as I love talking to you (eli/andy/taraz/bernie/whoever), I really do have to go....
Bye for now.
I don't care, what I know is that if rewards are irrelevant then exemplify it, and constructive criticism and bashing/griefing aren't the same thing, like I said, you are doing the equivalent of walking into a venue shitting in the middle of it and then trying to claim that what you did was a worthy contribution.
False equivalence.
38 people in the venue/crowd liked it... 1 didn't.
Are you saying the venue owners have a right to decide who the crowd likes?
Authoritarian, much?lol.
I only paraphrased/quoted, what the actual 'victims of my bashing', said.
Their words, not mine.
How is that 'bashing', to repeat their own words?
(I can see how the severely insecure would see it like that- but that's not my problem, that's theirs - It is also steem's problem - big time!)
So what that 38 people voted for it, how many actually watched it and how many are autovotes? Prove it, if rewards are irrelevant then decline to take rewards, otherwise they are oy as irrelevant as you claim, as you have no problem with accepting them.
Are you a little dense........ or a disingenuous steem worker
antsheep?....mmmm......
Accepting rewards and being down voted highlights the very thing we are discussing.
How would refusing them, further that? durrr.
Yeah, that doesn't work, does it?
(I'm now veering towards the former assertion I made)
Either way, it doesn't matter - the market is always right....
Oops, what does that make you...? (wrong, perchance? Perish the thought!)
Any rays of enlightenment penetrated that grey matter between your ears yet?
(the principles of banking and a legal precedent ruling as not yet overturned, from the 18 century- in relation to what depositors are at banks ?)
You are very funny.
P.S. You are in romania, right? - any good with a camera? where are you? I might have some paid work if you can take some pics...
We aren't discussing whatever you think we are discussing. I am talking about your hypocrisy, claiming that rewards are irrelevant and instead of declining them you pony up to get rewarded. I'm also pointing out that your delusional if you think that this unadulterated bashing is on the same page as valid, objective or otherwise constructive criticism, be it satirical or not. That has nothing to do with what you think we are discussing either, like the first thing.
If that's the case what is there to your discussion about the rewards huh? I imagine it's a disgruntled outlook at how you're deserving of more rewards than what you elicited, as you have made disgruntled posts numerous times regarding that, in your own words, your post should be worth one hundred dollars worth of steem, and one thousand would not be bad also, and if so, then you just shot yourself in the foot if now you're saying that these 38 autovotes are the market is always right (except for the downvotes, the market is always wrong with you there).
Keep bashing, keep insulting, keep attacking and all the while taking rewards from the very thing that you're bashing, it only demonstrates that nothing is beneath you, out of one corner of your mouth you rage on that fishing for whale votes isn't meritocracy, as if steem ever was proposed or implied at all to be such, and how your posts ought to earn a hundred dollars worth of steem, and meanwhile claim that you don't care about rewards, even though, you not only care enough to bash people over your own perceived lack of rewards and make what you think of as "satirical" videos regarding rewards, but you cannot even recognize that the only conversation I was engaged in has absolutely no interest in the "matter" behind your satire and was entirely directed at how you went about doing whatever you think you were doing (criticism) and pointing that by not using the option to refuse rewards, you are showing a lot of regard for rewards. Hey, but I'm a sheep, ant, etc, so who cares what I say, in other words "durrrr" indeed, you can mock me for pointing out that you're taking rewards while you claimed to not care for them, but you care enough to "demonstrate" what exactly by accepting rewards? Something something about how much you don't care about rewards, right.. Lol
BTW, calling people sheep is what bashing is. You can think that it's a valid critique but it's far from it, there's nothing valid, valuable or constructive, it only serves to belittle. Hey, but 38 people liked it, that means something right? That means it's not shitting in the middle of the venue, right? It's also bashing regardless if you use their words, or paraphrase them, it's all a mater of removing context and again how you used it only serves to belittle the other person, the same with calling people communists and arguing that communists are this way, that too is bashing. If you need the definition of bashing here it is:
You are correct with your comment. I am wrong.
Now that's cleared up ( ...and possibly given you a stiffy with that victory?), what's wrong with bashing?
I'm sure you're well aware of the politcal power of the 18th/19th century cartooninsts in France and England?
I'm not here to placate the sheep. I'm here to tell it as it is, as I see it - satirical bashing may be my vehicle of , and the oh so sensitive soy boys might be offended by the messenger (cool) but it's only the message that's relevant to me - and the more intelligent among us.
SJW's? Fuck 'em. (some of 'em look very nice, and is a literal statement).
ps - last comment was to raise the hackles of SJW idiots....
Watch em crawl out of the woodwork with sentences including misogyny...
lolol
pps - the photo work pays $50 for 2 hours work, and $20 travel expenses. (plus a confidentiality and a non ownership of the images produced (during the hours of employment) contract - signed.
You want me to point out what is wrong with bashing? Let me do you one better and ask you to point out what's right with it, if there's nothing wrong with it I'm sure you'll have no problem listing the numerous things that it's good for.
You know you're skating on thin ice when you don't have anything worthy or redeemable to justify bashing with and instead try to imply that bashing is harmless, that there is absolutely nothing wrong with it, I mean what's wrong with bashing?
You know the difference between those satirical cartoons and this unadulterated bashing? Satire is ALL about societal change/improvement, and those cartoons illustrated the failures of society in that regard, and are considered Valid, Constructive and otherwise Objective Criticism, not bashing (overtly critical) and that is only reinforced by the audience's overwhelming approval, as opposed to your, unadulterated bashing, which doesn't illustrate or explain / elucidate on anything like said societal change and is entirely only your very low opinions of certain people, period, low opinion based entirely on either one or two odd encounters so no real knowledge of the person, or if not the bashing is based entirely on how they rated your content and account, so either way it's an attack or completely personal.
You can think your bashing as "waking" the sleeping sheep up, but that is based entirely in delusion, the delusion that there are "leaders" (and hence, followers) and that if enough followers wake up to the evil/lazy/stupid leaders, then they will somehow reign the leaders in or rebuke the leaders' power, but it's completely delusional as there are no leaders, and there certainly are no followers, and no one is asleep like you think them, all they are is fellow bloggers, much more thoughtful and sensible than you and overall better writers as well, and also far more invested in the platform than you.
If you had valid critique it would go a long ways to remove any and all personal value judgements and character arguments/slander/attacks from those critiques, especially since this is obviously a matter of the platform (whole) not of individuals, and maybe then you can compare with satirical cartoons, but until you do so it's no different than all of your other character attack laden, unadulterated bashing and shitting "Posting" you've engaged in, either of the people who are far more successful than you, or of the place itself, or of myself repeatedly attacked for questioning your methods, reasoning and your intentions.