Something I have noticed very recently is that people in this movement will attempt to argue over absolutely anything and I find it rather ridiculous to say the least that people will even argue with their own belief system. When people are arguing about that of their own belief system, then how can anybody who even touches the movement be able to grasp the concepts of the principles that movement stands for?
We are seeing many people attempting to distance themselves from politics and join the liberty movement but we are still only a spec on the charts in terms of mass belief in this philosophy. Too often if you stay within the comforts of your echo-chambers you start to eat your own; we've seen this with the socialist movement or what people are now terming post modernism, they are now so set in their constantly changing ideology that anyone who questions anything within the movement is a coined a traitor or a none puritan.
I think it is tangible to say that this movement will die and become another political movement rather than a movement seeking to distance itself from politics altogether; if we continue to argue about intangible things that only make the movement weaker rather than stronger. I have some ideas on how we can accomplish this and schematics are already in the process of being created, these schematics will ensure the pursuance of an end goal will be accomplished and not just talked about within the comforts of our echo chambers.
Curious to hear about your ideas. As far as arguing, that's humans. I don't think there's any difference when we see examples of the left eating the left, or Catholics disagreeing with the globalist Pope, there is always infighting. Especially when people have their little platforms to make an opinion. I think the solution is just to read, read, read, and shut up until you have something really good to contribute. But most people don't read. Just look at it as background noise as you develop your schematics.