I am not a coder, but can follow logic. If code is presented logically, and not assuming prior knowledge, I can usually grasp basics. I was able to grasp the basics of your idea here, and find it important: a way for decentralized anonymous users to create and share data without sacrificing their anonymity, and to inure rewards to one another for doing so (if I did grasp basics =p).

However, I was impeded by some poor grammar.

"But that can be replicated merely by the write patterns to allow following the right order for reassembly if information is sparse and which piece goes where is distributed also in many pieces each actor as if holding some back because the blockchain order of new posts is part of the information needed to decide which previously posted pieces go where."

This run on sentence could benefit from some editing. I hope you don't take my criticism as negative, as I hope you can make this post more useful to me and others that are having difficulty grasping it by editing it to make it more understandable.

Let me know if I am missing important pieces, and please consider some editing work to let folks make better sense of your post.

Thanks!