Stubborn "Telegram". 自以為是 "Telegram".

The conflict between the former Russian entrepreneur Pavel Durov and the Russian authorities received an unprecedented continuation

前俄羅斯企業家帕維爾·杜羅夫和俄羅斯當局之間前所未有的衝突

The news that the Russian supervisory authority Roskomnadzor filed a lawsuit with the court demanding the blocking of the popular Telegram messenger in the territory of the Russian Federation. The violation is the refusal to provide the Federal Security Service with the keys to decrypt the private correspondence of users.

俄羅斯監管機構Roskomnadzor起訴法院試圖阻止流行的 messenger。
"Telegram"位於俄羅斯聯邦。 違規是拒絕向FSB提供解碼用戶個人信息的密鑰。

According to experts, there is no technical possibility of executing such a court decision that meets the requirements of the supervisory authority. The maximum that can be done is to block the web version and require Apple and Google to remove the messenger applications from their stores. However, such requirements are not automatically met.

據專家介紹，沒有技術機會可以執行符合監管當局要求的法院判決。 可以完成的最大限度是阻止網絡版本，並要求Apple和Google從其商店中刪除消息應用程序。 但是，這些要求不會自動滿足。

It should be noted that the refusal to provide encryption keys to Russia's special services, according to the version of the founders and leaders of the envoy, is connected with the technical impossibility of Telegram itself, decipher the correspondence of users. Thus, since the beginning of the conflict, the number of fans of this mobile application has grown. Pavel Durov managed to turn the persecution into a very effective advertising. It should be noted that the telegram management also rejected the requirement of special services of other countries.

根據領導者Telegram的版本，拒絕為俄羅斯特殊服務提供加密密鑰涉及程序本身解密用戶消息的技術不可行性。 因此，自衝突開始以來，該移動應用程序的粉絲數量不斷增長。 Pavel Durov成功地將迫害變成了非常有效的廣告。 應該指出的是，Telegram也拒絕了其他國家的要求。

An unprecedented process is expected. First of all, the demands of the Russian authorities at first are of an anti-constitutional nature. Secondly, there is no such law obliging to violate the Constitution of the Russian Federation in exceptional or any other cases. At least, that is how lawyers and leaders of the defendant think.

預計會有一個前所未有的進程。 首先，俄羅斯當局的要求起初是反憲法的。 其次，在特殊情況或任何其他情況下，沒有這種法律有義務違反俄羅斯聯邦憲法。 至少這是律師和被告領導人的想法。

My today's article is at http://xn--24-mlc6aplz.xn--p1ai/content/2018-04-09_Upryamyj_Telegram
I do not publish under my own name because of my ancient dissidence.

我今天的文章是在 http://xn--24-mlc6aplz.xn--p1ai/content/2018-04-09_Upryamyj_Telegram
由於我與俄羅斯當局存在分歧，他們用化名印了我。