No, Mr. Mat Howl - if that is your real name.
Owl assure you, it is not the same.
Otherwise I could be an owlsome painter of owls.
No, Mr. Mat Howl - if that is your real name.
Owl assure you, it is not the same.
Otherwise I could be an owlsome painter of owls.
But what if the paint would be used to draw three red circles and 6 white like the covers of the cans. That would not be an owl but it can be considered a painting :o)
You might create an owlsome painting. I will just make an owlful mess and waste paint.
A bucket of paint in your hands might have a better chance of being part of a great painting whereas it would only contribute to an increased amount of trash and crushed hopes and dreams in mine.
By no fault of it's own, the fate of the paint has been altered. Therefore, just the possibility of creating something good is not intrinsic to the paint.
Correlation v. Causation.
Everybody can and should create because it's fun. But only a few are great artists. There is more to a painting than soiling paper.
Have I taken this too far? Maybe :)
Posted using Partiko Android