You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Solving the Blockchain Governance Dilemma
Wait what?
$9.77 rewards?
Thank you so much @ausitbank, @msp-curation, @clayboyn.
You really made my day.
Wait what?
$9.77 rewards?
Thank you so much @ausitbank, @msp-curation, @clayboyn.
You really made my day.
you deserve it
Thanks!
It's like just 1% for them of something earning about 1500 Steem a week mining
Yeah... The rewards pool should be distributed better for sure.
i don't think it will, that much going to a concentrated pool of only 20 accounts it just way too bias, we should support a hf that gives it to 200 witnesses
Well, I think it should be less, maybe 100.
But think about incentives. Why would the top 20 witnesses support it if it means that they lose some of their rewards? Sure, the lower ones will love it, but think about incentives...
Maybe they'd be kind enough to support it, or maybe not.
should be staggered upto top 200, eg. 50% goes to top 50, then 25% goes to next 51-100, then 15% goes to next 101 to 150, then 10% goes to 151 to 200.
this will breed great community support and more active witness participation and development