That's about as cherry picked a line from an article about Writing characters that "think differently" when the author means to write characters have different reactions to situations which is oddly past the authors grasp that people raised somewhere else won't share the same ideals and that's when in the same thought her logic states that, despite culture, two siblings can have quite different ideals but somehow the differences are inconcevibly many as the author cannot fathom how despite different countries ideals can be sharred, but which is clear why they said that when in the next part ideals are brought back to Reactions when after which the author goes on to say that what differs isn't how people react but their cultural upbringing and their experiences, which doesn't do anything to establsh why we went from Reactions to Ideals, and back to Reactions while never establishing why and how people react the same. Should we entertain her hypothesis of how a girl in Saudi Arabia behaves if shes "odd" all to tell us that English is the most egalitarian language (because she's clearly a language expert)? Nope, it's simply to nag about how some book's characters ought to "think differently" a vague phrase that HARDLY means what it says and in it's seeking for "individuality" and "specialness" with the "odd people" that are "awkward" the author deserves a "very special" sticker.

On a side note about "individuality". How does that phrase go:

Divide and Conquer.