25 Reasons Steem Will Replace Bitcoin as #1 Cryptocurrency by 2021!

mrbearbear (54) 6 years ago (edited)

This post right here is exactly why steemit will not surpass bitcoin. Why? I'll break down my points.

Buying of votes. Yes I agree that it's allowable to some extent, but 650$? Hell no. Edit: now over 1000$ REALLY!?!?No post should ever be worth this much. Also no offense to @jerrybanfield but this post isn't worth that much, it shouldn't be. Better content writers such as @whatamidoing deserve bigger payouts.
The fact that it seems like only the users control steemit. And look where it has got us? You have @haejin fucking upvoting his shit NINE TIMES A DAY. Nobody can do anything to stop it because he has a ton of funds at his deposal to keep his stuff up.
Minnow support is not strong enough. It relys on the good faith of other users to delegate their sp to it. Kinda hard to do that when the average user has jack shit for steem. Speaking of minnow support, how about you donate some of that sp to it @jerrybanfield instead of reaping all the rewards? Maybe for every other day, you should be using your voting bot FOR FREE.
Witnesses don't give a shit. The major users who are witnesses are just taking in profits while doing nothing. Do we REALLY need another steemit mobile app? No. Instead, we should be figuring out how to stop such abusive users from posting 9 times a day with 100$+ profit on each post.
Censorship. While sometimes it's understandable to downvote comments, it's way to powerful. All it would take for my comment to be hidden is a down vote from @haejin or @jerrybanfield .

Forgive me I'm drinking, but I think I got my point across. In this form , steemit WILL NOT EVER surpass bitcoin, not in a million years.

$19.22

itstime (60) 6 years ago

@mrbearbear - hey man , slightly disagree with your view point , as follows

Take any social media platform , one only succeeds when either they content is gold (Phiily D/ Casey N / others) or they have actual gold (CNN/ Comedy central/other big brands). Let's call it sweat equity vs sweet equity....those are the rules , they may not be fair but those are the rules.

With this context , to your points-

Free market , you can bid as much as you can afford , what's wrong with that?
Either you can bid or cannot bid , once it is ok to bid there can't be any limits.
Money talks , that's life.
Kind of sucks for rest of us.
Charity is not going to get us further in this venture.
As it is the platform is in it's initial years , it's time to put in the sweat equity. If/when it goes mainstream , whatever little minnow support is there will be vanished pretty fast.
Possibly you have tried running a facebook page/ Instagram page or Youtube , it's cut throat competition on those platforms.
As it is pointed out in other trending post today , unless there is monetary incentive for people to clean this stuff up , It's never going to happen.
Well yeah , it is sort of decentralized censorship.

Mean no disrespect , just disagree

$0.29

4 votes

mrbearbear (54) 6 years ago (edited)

Everyone is entitled to have their own opinions! No worries. Here is my rebuttal

The problem with bid bots is the issue with the rewards pool. Jerry's 2000$ plus reward is taking away from all the other posts for his payout. Constant abuse will only make it worse, encouraging other users to do so. Here in the states, we are technically free market, but even then we have certain laws in place to prevent stuff like this from happening. If you want, I'll ellaborate even further in a future response.
Steemit was made to be a decentralized platform. The path it's headed to is centralization, which the developers have not done anything about. The platform is still young, and much more should be done.
Minnow support will not disappear, but it will lose value. Charities are still around today in our so called free market.
That one I'm in full agreement with. As I was talking with steem.services below, I highly doubt something will be done, unless steem has some sort of competition.
Goes back to the centralization. A single downvote should not be able to make a post hidden. With little accounts that's not an issue with. Nothing decentralized about that.

But of course let's not forget what the whole article is about. Jerry stated he thinks steem will surpass bitcoin in 2021. In this state, it won't, ever. For that to happen, we need growth, and as @themarkymark stated in one of his articles, the growth we are seeing is spam accounts, taking away from actual real users trying to get on the platform.

Not to mention, steem has dropped in market cap right now to below 30. There was a time it was much higher.

$0.13

itstime (60) 6 years ago (edited)

Hey , look at that , 2 people on internet debating without name calling :)

Either bid bots are ok or are they not ok ? we need to make that determination first , if it's ok people will use leverage.

I understand the laws to break down monopoly to foster "free market" but I don't think that would apply within an ecosystem.

If it was upto me , bid bots shouldn't be allowed at all but I also know if we suppress the bid bots it will happen behind the scene on private chat servers .

Unless there is some manual curation or bid bot ban it's probably not going to change.

2.Centralized by people heavily investing in it and becoming whales , they are taking risk by investing and ought to be rewarded by the heavy influence they get in return.

To your broader point , yes, the title is clickbaity but I also see that @jerrybanfield has put a lot of effort in presenting the hour long well researched presentation.

$0.00

mrbearbear (54) 6 years ago

If I could be gone with the voting bots, I wouldn't have them at all, but I know most likely that will never happen. But there are things that can be done to fix the payouts such as capping it, or playing out to more the the curators after a certain percentage.
Imo, the power they have now is wayyyyyyyyy to much. Nobody should have these type of power to either upvote you or downvote you into Oblivion with 1 vote. That needs to change. This is definitely a fix they can do.

$0.00

itstime (60) 6 years ago

I guess what you are saying is break up the monopoly of whales by forcing them divest , it has happened in world with big companies but since there is no ID check behind Steem a whale can just create shadow account and split token amongst them.

I do , however , take your broader point about the problem statement of few players having too much influence to leverage the rewards pool.

Here is a potential solution - once you go above a certain reward value , a % is deducted ( let's call it steem tax ?) and that gets fed back into the system.

Dramatic recreation :Here we see a regular steem user being Fuc$$d by a whale

$0.00

anonymint (65) 6 years ago

Here is a potential solution - once you go above a certain reward value , a % is deducted ( let's call it steem tax ?) and that gets fed back into the system.

They will just make more blogs and comment posts with sockpuppets to side-step any threshold.

Sorry there’s no fix for Steem’s reward system. Can’t be fixed. I pointed that out back in 2016.

$0.33

h00pla85 (-2)(1) 6 years ago

There will always be ways to abuse the system, it is just way too easy right now. They could at least attempt to implement a system to make it difficult.

Rewards need exponentially more voting to increase rewards beyond certain thresholds.
Whale accounts can not longer only upvote a single account and that is it. Make it so one single account cannot contribute more than 5-10% to the reward payout. These whale accounts also need to contribute to other accounts, so make it so they can only vote for a single account once a day, 3 times a week.
have large payouts reviewed and have the possibility of them being denied/reduced by a random jury

Will it fix the issue, not completely, but at least it will make it harder from them to scam the system

$0.00

nabstertsr (50) 6 years ago

baejin x 2

$0.05

steem.services (61) 6 years ago

The points you mention are definitely opportunities for Steemit Inc. to take notice of and make some improvements on the Steem blockchain level.

One recommendation that comes to mind is to enable beneficiary features for post payouts, and to make it so that the more a post earns, the higher the % beneficiary payout would be. That said beneficiary payout could get redistributed as beneficiary rewards to the author's followers/post upvoters/special Steem projects of author's choice/all Steemians. These are just some thoughts and suggestions.

To reduce Steem inflation, a portion of the beneficiary payouts could even get somehow redistributed back into the reward pool or burned (this should be possible without major whales having to downvote overly overvalued and/or spammy/abusive posts). To help with post spam, the initial automatic beneficiary payout % for each post over 4 within 24 hours would be increasingly higher on a linear or exponential scale.

And to help with direct message spam, I have an idea revolving around increasing the SBD from direct message transaction fees once a certain threshold is hit within a certain time frame.
For example, one solution would be to increase the min transaction fee by 0.001 for each 100 messages sent within the hour. The fee would be reduced back to 0.001 if the user waits [(number of messages sent within last 24 hours)/100] hour(s).

These are just some suggestions. Feel free to share yours.

$0.04

mrbearbear (54) 6 years ago (edited)

These voting bots either need to be more strict about blacklisting people, learn to show restraint with all the income they get, make some days free for low level users, or somehow just remove upvote bots all together. Love the idea of the higher beneficiary payout. And I would love steem.inc to take notice of this post. Sadly, I dont think it will happen. Edit: one other point, maybe if steem had some sort of competition, maybe then they would fix this mess.

$0.05

eleftheriosart (55) 6 years ago

Very interesting information!!!

$0.00

mrsomeone (36) 6 years ago

He doesn't make it better with his picture lol

$0.00

h00pla85 (-2)(1) 6 years ago

Great post. People cannot moderate themselves. People abuse the system and there is nothing anyone can do. If anyone mentions the abuse, they get flagged to death.

The sad thing is with minor tweaks this platform can remedy majority of the issues but literally nothing is being done.

It is a joke to think this platform will ever past BTC or any top coin for that matter, especially in the state it is in with the insane amount of manipulation and reward raping going on. imagine if bigger money came in, there is literally nothing in place to stop this abuse or to empower the majority to intervene. you have people that can literally post the same blog 10 times a day, have a few whales upvote it and self vote and boom $2000-4000 a day

$0.00

toshlenoir (37) 6 years ago

Can I have your bitcoin then?

$0.00

mrbearbear (54) 6 years ago

You should be asking Jerry that, not me .

$0.00

hasenmann (65) 6 years ago

I thought abour writing exactly what you said. But then I read your comment.
Thanks for the summary. That´s all I think what´s going wrong.

There are so many good content creators here that only get a few cents for their content.
And this one here gets over 1000??? Sorry.....

There should be some kind of regulation or limit in voting...
Or anything else. But this is not what its ment to be.

I´ll keep posting and commenting.... but sometimes... I think to myself... WTF???

$0.00

howo (70) 6 years ago

This.

$0.00

sames (65) 6 years ago

Here another thing bitcoin has smart contracts and token is the form of rsk.co
It has kind do 1K tps and more with sharding. As good as steem no but it can scale to billions one day
And second bitcoin is working on diff scaling methods yes it not as good as other coins right now almost every coin has bitcoin traits and many tech is being made by bitcoin every day that other coins are just taking. This was the dumbest post i ever read....
Hope you liked my addition to your claims :)

$0.00

joeyarnoldvn (61) 6 years ago

You don't want people to upvote too much and you do not want people to downvote too much? Why not combine those two things? If somebody upvotes too much, then why not downvote them too much to fix it? The market is all about supply and demand, right? I do not like regulation. I want more freedoms which can be used for good and for bad and life requires both, the Ying and the Yang.

$0.00

mrbearbear (54) 6 years ago (edited)

Because, it's impossible for both sets of votes to have the same affect. Take for example, haejin. With the cash flow he has, he can downvote any comment til the point it won't be seen. It would take multiple wealthy accounts to get it shown again. Accounts with little sp cant do anything against that. As it t stands right now, there is no balance.

$0.00

joeyarnoldvn (61) 6 years ago

If you want balance, you have to get more SP or a bunch of people to counter downvotes and upvotes. I believe in becoming the change, the revolution, that you desire in the world.

$0.00

doelist (51) 6 years ago (edited)

I have idea how to make this situation a little bit better. I've worked on this idea for 3 months. Hope I launch it soon.

$0.00

lazylag (25) 6 years ago

this is the best post, you have to write more when you are drinking mode m8, and yes what i see where in steam in few days or weeks i have is louds of scams, and selfishness, all most 20 years ago when i start to hear about blockchain and is potential the 1 thing that catch in my mind this is a game changer, the immediately 2 thought as in 15 years we gona see that really people can't do better.
And one more time in 3 generations we ill give control to the master of puputs, no other generations 4 to be precise have 3 game changes in their lives, and opportunity to be together as united to take control from corporations, bankers, and Fundations. And one more time what we do? sacming, expeculation, take advantage from others.
20 years ago i as making our participating in designed study about excellence and mediocrity for Oxford University with more 120 people from all areas, this study as a propose to understand better the reasons of big corporations contract people that put world on edge of a bankruptcy and difficult situation, the iden and true reason as to see how is the real demancion of control and why some as not possible to control and how to do it.
So as find that 2/3 of humanity is medicucrecy and 1/3 is on excelency this as 20 years ago, so you can see very clearly the results of this work.
Blockchain as designed and the tester our the catcher this time as digital currency, we have 2 at best expectations 4 years for all of this get in the hands the real people that have a real and practical agenda.
Unfortunately one more time people are so blind with the little greed that cant see the opportunity they lost in all 2016/2017.
So yes unfortunately steam is not what as designed to be is just one more elethis thing for scammers, greed people andsome desapointed belivers

$0.00

lexiconical (72) 6 years ago

"medicucrecy "

Painfully ironic.

$0.00

transisto (74) 6 years ago (edited)

You have @haejin fucking upvoting his shit NINE TIMES A DAY. Nobody can do anything to stop it

Correction 10 times a day. You can follow @FlagTarget. It resteems @haejin's 8th 9th and 10th post every day as targets to flag.

Ps: About 3000 USD worth of votes were purchased on that one.

$0.00

5 votes

mrbearbear (54) 6 years ago

Jesus, he's pushing it even more?!?

$0.00

lexiconical (72) 6 years ago

Devil's advocate here, since I'm not actively disagreeing with you:

This post is definitely taking a loss. This is a hate the game, not the player, situation.
See #5
Jerry does delegate to MinnowSupport, at least 1000SP currently, if I am not mistaken. You are correct it is difficult to get delegations since they don't pay anything, and the game theory of Steemit is now all paid delegations. Jerry also gave up much of his delegation to the JerryBot, forgoing rewards for some time and letting other delegators have his share.
See #5
You ask for a prevention of censorship, after asking for users to be censored in 40% of your other points.

I will generously chalk this up to the drinking.

PS - I thoroughly hate the (Steemit) game at this point, in case that wasn't obvious.

$0.00

crypto2crypto (63) 6 years ago

It is what it is. Broken system creates broken players.

$14.30

josteem (58) 6 years ago

Agree

$0.75

anonymint (65) 6 years ago

Exactly. I have written a point-by-point rebuttal of @‍jerrybanfield’s incorrect propaganda campaign.

$0.07

socky (72) 6 years ago

@jerrybanfield, we need both STEEM and SBD on a major multilingual exchange. Right now we have Bittrex (English Only) and Upbit (Korean Only). Binance doesn't count since they don't support SBD. Poloniex and HitBTC have disabled the STEEM and SBD wallets and don't seem to want the business. This has been going on for months.

Both STEEM and SBD are extremely undervalued because they are just not available everywhere like other currencies are. Other currencies have a staff that is aggressively pursuing every avenue to get their currency listed on many exchanges. I don't know if that this is the same for STEEM/SBD. I get the feeling that the approach is a Field of Dreams "Build it and they will come". With the massive amount of competition, I don't believe an approach like that will prevail.

Can you help support getting the right persons to fill out this form to get STEEM and SBD listed on KuCoin?http://kucoinform.mikecrm.com/tAssDWK

We also need Poloniex and HitBTC to stop holding the STEEM and SBD wallets hostage. Do you know what, if anything, is being done?

$10.69

7 votes

mysearchisover (70) 6 years ago

I like your constructive reply. I upvoted you. I think you should use some bots and try and rise to the top of this comment section. Please! lol

$0.27

josteem (58) 6 years ago

Agree with you .. I will sign it myself. If you have it in a special post , I willing resteeem it.

$0.25

socky (72) 6 years ago

Check this one out. The last week, the focus was Cobinhood. At least with that one, anyone can fill out the form. You don’t need to be a STEEM executive. https://steemit.com/steemit/@socky/you-can-boost-the-price-of-steem-and-sbd#comments
Thank you for asking and the support!

$2.47

josteem (58) 6 years ago

Thank you so much for your link

$0.86

josteem (58) 6 years ago

Gr8 link

$0.46

silentworld (52) 6 years ago

@socky , your comment is specified and pointed,very good job bro.

$0.00

mysearchisover (70) 6 years ago

FYI there is a .02 minimum payout on earnings so right now you basically wasted an upvote on yourself.

$0.22

lexiconical (72) 6 years ago

"Both STEEM and SBD are extremely undervalued because they are just not available everywhere like other currencies are. "

Do you have any evidence for this wild assertion?

The problem with getting Steem listed on exchanges is obvious. It's not just a sequence of characters for an address, is it? Exchanges have to run and interface with a fucking Steemit account. There is no wallet.

Be careful what you wish for. You really want your massively-below-average-volume-for-its-market-cap, perpetually inflationary, PR-problem crypto exposed to the big boys?

$0.00

transparencybot (-9)(1) 6 years ago (edited)

This post, with over $50.00 in bidbot payouts, has received votes from the following:

postpromoter payout in the amount of $420 USD.
smartsteem payout in the amount of $279 USD.
appreciator payout in the amount of $236 USD.
upme payout in the amount of $190 USD.
rocky1 payout in the amount of $157 USD.
promobot payout in the amount of $114 USD.
buildawhale payout in the amount of $94 USD.
therising payout in the amount of $79 USD.
booster payout in the amount of $71 USD.
jerrybanfield payout in the amount of $45 USD.

For a total calculated bidbot upvote value in the amount of $1,685 USD.

This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform @jerrybanfield and is by no means a judgement of your work.

$8.08

8 votes

hellocrypto (55) 6 years ago

That's a lot of bots in play...

$2.33

imjustsaying (50) 6 years ago

This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform @jerrybanfield and is by no means a judgement of your work.

But I think in this case... It really could be a judgement of his work.

No offense Jerry, but it's sort of hard to take you serious when you have videos telling people to invest just to start circlej*rks and self upvote to earn 2% interest every 5 days.

How does advise like this help build a sustainable investor friendly system? Sure you can make a few bucks for a while but it's behavior like this that will never allow steem to overtake bitcoin. But what do I know I'm just a little old redfish.

$0.16

anonymint (65) 6 years ago (edited)

The blog post for that video explains that as more people utilize their voting power then the ROI will decline (to as low as the Steem inflation rate which is 9% per annum and decreasing by 0.5% per annum).

It appears to me that the current ROI is about 0.33% per 5 days, and that is 0.58 – 0.67% factoring in that SBD are currently are $3.50 – $4.

$0.09

anonymint (65) 6 years ago (edited)

In that video you cited, he is correctly informing users that if they don’t do it, they are falling behind others who do it. IOW, he is explaining that the rewards system of Steem is a Prisoner’s dilemma (and it can’t be fixed no matter how it is changed!).

However, I don’t think that 2% compounded is realistic for anyone with significant size. That would be 400+% increase in STEEM POWER per annum! Would be flagged by other whales who wouldn’t want you encroaching on their rewards turf.

I have written a point-by-point rebuttal of @‍jerrybanfield’s incorrect propaganda campaign.

$0.07

imjustsaying (50) 6 years ago

I suppose the purpose of me posting this was to bring attention to the contradiction that one who is willing to r*pe the reward pool by $1.6k via bidbots(when he could have easily promoted it, or declined payout.), couldn't possibly think that this behavior would allow for a long term net positive for steem. That mixed with his history (This video as one example.) of promoting people to "game the system" would leave one to logically assume that he is "gaming us." I thought that maybe I could save someone from wasting their voting power, on what appears to be a shady used car dealer.

Who knows I might even earn my first flag out of this one.

I don't know if the cancer that is eating away at our system is able to be cured, but I still have a bit of hope.

$0.00

anonymint (65) 6 years ago (edited)

Don’t lose idealistic hope. Others (such as myself) are working on solutions.

One of the reasons (in addition to vested bias I have) of writing about the flaws, is so that hopefully users will not be totally devastated and turn away from the concept. I want people to know that others are aware of the issues and working on solutions.

_{The project I’m working on won’t be named STEEM though, i.e. we’re not going to fix Steem but rather attempt to supersede it.}

$0.33

imjustsaying (50) 6 years ago

Well, keep me in the loop, let me know when you have a name. I'm very interested in this idea, it does seem to be the way of the future. I only have a couple hundred hours invested in steem, so I'm open to the idea of different platforms. Who knows they might be able to patch up this old experiment of a ship.

$0.23

bycoleman (59) 6 years ago

sustainable investor friendly system?

It may no longer be possible, parasitic greed is now devouring the host and there may not be any cure.

But there are changes that could be incorporated and some of the witnesses have these concepts, yet I do not believe they will ever be incorporated, since the easy money is polluting all reasoned arguments.

I'm going to fight for it just the same.

Blessings!

$0.00

imjustsaying (50) 6 years ago

I will do that same with my small voice.

I totally love the idea of our beautiful community, it is sad to see it slowly die away leaving only spam and rubbish, where there once was beauty and creativity.

Hmm...

Maybe I should make 35 memes about it, seems to be the new language of the day.

$0.00

voicedream (47) 6 years ago

Click the Play button below and start listening to the audio version of this article.

$6.16

josteem (58) 6 years ago

WOW .. great service ... it’s a hidden gem 💎 how brilliant idea I think could benefit more inere written articles which has no video embedded!
Respect ✊

$0.80

albanian (36) 6 years ago

@Jerrybanfied,

You sound like a timeshare sales agent and it was a waste of time to read all your 25 "reasons" that actually put some cloud on real value of steemit as a compeeting platform of free speech. By referring to Bitcoin as "inferior " you expose yourself of a very shallow knowledge about it and seriously shattered my confidence to rely on your opinions for anything else that I would seek education for....

If you really want to inform your readers about steem stick at the values that steem has unique compared to any other crypto including Bitcoin.
Usability is not enough to make steem better than Bitcoin. Water is even more useful than all things you are talking here but it's abundant. SCARCITY is what you have forgotten here and I know that you keep doing videos from at least a year ago so that makes me thinking even for your integrity...

Homework :

Research the Bitcoin and Steem thoroughly, then come up with the best of both.
Please explain to all readers why would we need another crypto here at steem and what would make bitcoins unsuitable for payments within steem?

I will be happy to see your evolved reasons that by reading them would benefit the newcomers AND yourself for delivering better content.

I apologize for my harsh tone and limited English.

Love you back...:-)

$5.72

12 votes

lexiconical (72) 6 years ago

"Usability is not enough to make steem better than Bitcoin. Water is even more useful than all things you are talking here but it's abundant. SCARCITY is what you have forgotten here and I know that you keep doing videos from at least a year ago so that makes me thinking even for your integrity..."

Excellent point and analogy. The whole crypto space often appears to ignore this economic fundamental. Deflationary projects are the dark horses who may win in the end. (Bitcoin is one that is deflationary, thanks to lost coins and strict cap.)

$0.00

introvert-dime (67) 6 years ago

Every crypto has its own place. Steemit cant replace bitcoin because its not as secure and decentralised as bitcoin.

$3.25

wf9877 (69) 6 years ago

Steemit is good, but I don't think so

$1.77

anonymint (65) 6 years ago (edited)

[…] but I don't think so

Your skepticism is well founded. I have written a point-by-point rebuttal.

$0.39

gold84 (63) 6 years ago

Hi @jerrybanfield ! Your post is great including several of the most important live projects on the steem blockchain!

It would have been great to have as item 26, the @steem-ambassador guild and #promo-steem which as you know it is rewarding steem promoters/voluntarysts around the world who are spreading the word about the blockchain and onboarding thousands of users to the blockchain.

I even made a recent post for Steem Ambassadors - Have you Considered Voting for @lukestokes.mhth and @jerrybanfield as Witnesses - They are the 2 Witnesses Supporting the @steem-ambassador Guild for Now

Looking forward to your thoughts!

Regards, @gold84

$1.76

josteem (58) 6 years ago

Never heard of any of The two , but would really worth loo No into them. Thanks for increasing my knowledge 🙏🏼

$0.78

starkerz (65) 6 years ago

Agreed @gold84 ;)

$0.17

gold84 (63) 6 years ago

Great we realized about the same thing @starkerz !
Regards, @gold84

$0.00

reko (70) 6 years ago

3rd that! ;)

$0.00

windytram (25) 6 years ago

vote

$0.00

nrbchowdhury333 (25) 6 years ago

https://steemit.com/dmania/@nrbchowdhury333/a-beautiful-song-or-beautiful-dance-zg1hbmlh-dclxa
@starkerz
@windytram
plz vote me bro

$0.00

mvillegas2 (31) 6 years ago

Hello! I find a lot of interest in your comment. I did not know there was a program, if that's what you'd call it, that rewards people for promoting steem. I, myself, have brought about 5 new users to the steem platform. How does one join? I would like some information if you wouldn't mind sparing some time to show me the way.

$0.00

lauram (54) 6 years ago

completely agree with you, @ gold84.

$0.00

silentworld (52) 6 years ago

yes,I'm agree with you bro, @gold84, his post included several important topics and very ,much informative

$0.00

julisavio (69) 6 years ago

Greetings, Great Jerry

I do not understand you as much as you do about this blockchaim technology. But reading your writing, I'm very excited about it.

I had a little bit of money invested in bitcoin and other altcoins. I took all of their money and bought steem power, so I think of steemit as a way to work and I'm really investing here.

I'm very grateful for your idea of steem overcoming bitcoin, because, I imagine that all members of this community will be gratified, both for the increase of steem value and for the number of people that will enter here !!!

Thank you and good night!

$1.64

anonymint (65) 6 years ago (edited)

I wish you will not remain highly misinformed. I have written a point-by-point rebuttal of @‍jerrybanfield’s incorrect propaganda campaign.

$0.38