You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Should people be required to hold steem power to benefit more from the platform?
How?
Less incentive I guess
That's already done with votes being worth 0.00something unless you have 90 STEEM which will give a 0.01
I mean incoming upvotes not so much votes going outward. Either way I may be arguing too much in detail at this point anyway. I think my overall argument is meant as broad strokes. Not so much specific numbers. I need to step back from that.
They should not be looked at in any way because they are the 1%, probably even less.
I can see that, but at the same time, I want to make it clear that we should design our trails to go in the direction of providing incentives to people who take the initiative to invest in the platform. And dapps devs should do this as well.
So circle jerks and curation trails that do pretty much the same? woohooo!! that will surely help our platform grow and bring in more scammers and people who think that their steemit account is a money making machine.
BTW what is trevons trail about? Who does he upvote? those that have enough SP? IMO that scammer doesn't deserve to make 2 cents here and I have no clue why he is not yet expelled or flaged out of existence.
There has to be someone judging the quality of the content at the top. There needs to be stuff in place to gauge the quality of the content.
Everyone gets 2 upvotes a day. He will actively kick people out of the trail who don't do good stuff. 500 sp gets you 5%. 1000-1000 gets a 10% upvote ect.
You may not like him as an individual but he has the right idea. I like this model a lot and once I am on steemit 2.0 where I will have a much larger stake. I may do a similar model but based on other metrics like number of organic views and activity / receptivity with the community ect.