That's really really thought provoking questions. I never had interest in a blockchain constitution as I had believe so much in a decentralized kind of platform where the members makes the laws and do what they think is right. But with happenings all over Steemit, I have come to noticed that people cannot just be allowed to self governed themselves, as most of the time our selfish and greed makes up jump into what you mentioned in your video as 'might is right' therefore, they will be need for a certain level of guides and constitution to shape our engagement and behaviours in a community base platform to ensure it's sustenance.

On the issue of @dan's vision of a system of governance that's both voluntary and non violent, I will want to see how this goes. Since I haven't read the two articles where he talked about his vision and plans, I won't have much to say. But will take a deeper look into those two articles, then I'll be able to contribute on that matter.