You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: EOS is more Centralized than Steem
Most of those top addresses belong to exchanges and in turn by users of those exchanges making claims of centralization false.
Most of those top addresses belong to exchanges and in turn by users of those exchanges making claims of centralization false.
That doesn't mean a coin isn't centralized. The exchange technically has access to all of the keys and could theoretically misuse those keys if they wanted to. There is an additional element of "trust" there. Now granted that such keys aren't being used for staking purposes is another consideration altogether, but if an exchange were to be hacked of all of said token, then that would be a potential problem. The more tightly distributed tokens happen to be (regardless of location), the less secure a network is.
Ownership of tokens is not as centralized as claimed in this post.
Even if exchanges hold many tokens for owners does not make EOS centralized.
Also, some exchanges like Bitfinex committed to let token owners to vote with their tokens while stored on exchange.
Thank you for readdressing this point but I already mentioned it.
Title of the post leaves no doubts about your actual claim.
AKA
Aka you made a false claim in the title and left yourself a way out with
"Perhaps this is jumping the gun a bit" in post content.
You still haven't read what I wrote, but by all means keep trying to put the blame on me here.
I read your post.
What stands out is not your hidden disclaimer, but false, click bait title spreading FUD.
Yes, that "hidden" disclaimer. An entire paragraph of seven whole paragraphs you couldn't be bothered to read before opening that yapper of yours.
EOS is my favorite coin right now take that FUD argument and shove it. Comparing two blockchains made by the same person isn't FUD.