You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: This post was censored by Dan Larimer and the EOS team because it raised important questions about EOS
I aim to always keep an open mind and not make any judgments or jump to conclusions - it's the only way to know truth. I don't really have time to read or comment on this fully now, but I have a quick question:
What is the source of the EOS image with the apparent snake tail? I did a reverse image search for it in google and it turned up zero matches.
The source isn’t from us. This entire article is hilarious. Being on the opposite side of conspiracy theories has been quite eye opening for me. Makes me take similar theory about others with a grain of salt.
I am currently in a similar position due to no fault of my own, so I actually understand too. Which is part of why I went to some lengths to explain about the needs for neutrality and care/diligence to detail.
That said, it helps to have an understanding of the symbology that really is being used in our world by certain groups so as to not accidentally get caught up doing similar.
Nevermind, I see you linked the Kraken post on your other blog.
Please do have a read.. I'll be very happy to get your feedback
Obviously this is a multi-faceted and complicated topic. Any minor mis-interpretation or incorrect definition in one place can dramatically change the direction of thinking in other places.
For this reason, I prefer not to comment usually on such things unless I have a lot of time to go into detail on all relevant points.
As Ronald Bernard stated recently, it is certainly possible that some or many of the early crypto systems were/are trojans designed to perpetuate problems and not solve them. It is also possible that any idea, regardless of its merit and integrity can and may be targeted for corruption, just as appears to have been the case with Nikola Tesla. On that note, if you didn't already see it - I suggest checking out this post that ties D. Trump's uncle to the theosophical society.
As far as the symbology goes - I also thought the sunray imagery and 'new day' theme of EOS was suspect and wasn't sure if it was just a poorly thought out idea or if it really is a sign of something nefarious. If I had seen the 'snake'without someone saying it was a snake, I might not have thought of it in that way - but since this image only appeared on Kraken, if it is intended to be a snake, since it hasn't appeared anywhere else - it has to be treated as potentially only being something that relates to whoever is the designer for the images at Kraken. It is entirely possible for anyone with artistic license to insert their own agenda into artwork unchallenged in corporations - especially when the symbolism is hidden/esoteric.
As @teamsteem commented on your older post, any tool might be used for 'good' or 'bad', for example - a knife can be used to harm or help heal. For me, luciferianism is about a lack of heart and a lack of love - so it can take almost any creation and distort/warp it into something that is anti-love and anti-life. Since luciferianism is also about taking power and dominating life, it makes sense that any potentially powerful project will be targeted for control by such groups. Therefore, it is hard to say who exactly is responsible for what here.
The safe approach is to always ensure we do not get 'hooked' into this or any other technology. Stay close to the Earth and learn about living in a natural way, so that if any particular technology turns out to be being used to enslave or for evil, we can drop it in a second with no problem.
As far as the logo design goes, sacred geometry is a topic that few people have studied or understand. The pentagram, star tetrahedron and other forms are not evil, any more than a circle is evil. If you stand with your arms and legs out stretched, you form the shape of a pentagram. The star tetrahedron (6 pointed star) contains geometries found throughout your body. The problem is not the geometry, but its corrupted use by certain groups.
Clearly it is a complicated topic, but I take a very simple view on it. Any shared systems (especially monetarily based systems) are based upon trust. Many people want to get away from the governments and banks because they no longer trust them. Their default response is to then move into cryptos. The accompanying default thinking is that if it's open source, it can be trusted. This isn't true at all. The trust is completely based upon the teams and people involved in any of the projects that you are engaging in and buying coins or tokens from. The most important point here is that there are a hell of a lot of reasons not to trust the EOS team despite the fact that so many people want to believe in it. Caveat Emptor!
In addition, I agree that symbolism of a circle and star don't necessarily mean much, but this is NOT circle and star symbolism that we are talking about here. Anyone with a good understanding of symbolism understands exactly what is being spelled out by the complex symbolism being applied with EOS. Those that don't see this are either those that simply don't understand the symbolism because they are too inexperienced or don't WANT to understand the symbolism because of what it implies and because of the ensuing cognitive dissonance associated with this meaning.
I second your post. Interesting info to say the least.
Thanks very much
The source isn’t from us. This entire article is hilarious. Being on the opposite side of conspiracy theories has been quite eye opening for me. Makes me take similar theory about others with a grain of salt.