I watch cypherglass/everything eos podcast from time to time and something that always strikes me is the complete lack of critical thinking towards just about any EOS project or promotion. And there's a difference between FUD and raising criticisms that might actually benefit the projects being discussed, the ecosystem and the overall community.

One instance that always comes to mind is the over-the-top fanboy giddiness towards the introduction of biometric ID. I'm consistently floored by the complete absence of discussion around some of the potential dangers, ramifications and implications of biometrics throughout society. At the very least, they could acknowledge the downsides.

A few months ago I read a steemit post by @cypherglass account bragging how EOS was the first of its kind to introduce a Owner key and Active Key security feature! And they posted this on the Steem blockchain, hello? Earth to cypherglass, Steem has had multiple security levels and permission keys since it's inception in 2016.

https://steempeak.com/@cypherglass/new-proposal-eos-unstaking

Now, I do find cypherglass and Everything EOS to be informative on a number of topics but I really wish they would be less shilly and do their homework before making claims that are simply untrue.