I might be a fan or I might not. Or anything between and you will never know.
On the other hand your post calls "try EOS" on multiple places (I have nothing against EOS and Im invested in it). That leads me to a slight suspicion you might be biased.

I still dont see the advocation. He said "I can argue" not "I believe or I think".

Look, I can argue Vitalik is a child porn advocate or that he runs Eth. in a very uncetralized way and I can agree or disagree with that. The point is I can argue the other side too.

Did you ever try to argue the opposite side of the topic even if you didnt agree with it? Can I argue just for the sake of argument without being marked as an advocate of that thing? .....if not, "bravo" to free speech.

I apologise for my harsh first comment.