You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Last Memory - Finish the Story contest 37

in #finishthestory5 years ago (edited)

{How can this ending be complete without this included? (As the internet will say: the “feels” were strong in this one.) It would be a crime not to include some emotional background music.}

Unto the story proper, or how your Symbolic Father basically abandoned you and how it parallels the empty universe that Christians felt when Christ died on the cross... what, dost thou want me to do this? and dost thou want it in a poem as well?... not the latter but definitely the former, I see... well let’s get to it the story then, albeit I feel like doing a Kirkegaardian existential analysis but shall delay that...

Well for the reader that thinks for a second, the theme of father-son relations (or creator-created on a conscious level) had definitely carried over from the prompt to the ending. This whole non-contradictory antagonism is seen throughout were the created begs for recognition, to then only recieve near moments of his death, to then demanding things of his creator, to then finally be betrayed for the last time. (Nota bene, it is in this case non-contradictory as in their opposition is rather passive than active until the very end.) Id est, even when we have a contradictory antagonism at the end, it was immediate and only superseding, overcoming or aufheben, one thing: roles. This sudden change of roles is rather haphazard as it forces a synthesis, but in the end neither resolving Ethan’s desires nor Yoh’s subtle incompetence to do more than Yoh had. Which leads me to saying the first part: how your Symbolic Father basically abandoned you.

Because in essence, Yoh does another betrayal even when Yoh recognizes Ethan: abandoment. Yoh could create, but he couldn’t live up to see the created question Yoh on matters Yoh knew Yoh would never know how to answer. But what about the Symbolic part other than the prothesis (limb) of the story? The Symbolic part is that Ethan knew, but didn’t had to necessarily believe to feel whole, that the Consciousness of Yoh dictated everything from both material being to their general meaning... or had been trying to make meaning out of everything. See, when Ethan asked things the Symbolic Father had failed to make knowable (or couldn’t signify), the Conscious of Yoh was stuck. It knew that these semblances existed and Yoh worked hard to tidy these up, yet it failed and now appears as holes in itself. In particular, Meaning.

And so we live up to the drama of how your Symbolic Father basically abandoned you: it couldn’t signify these things out of its grasp that it has been struggling to subdue for who knows long. And so, instead of continuing the awkwardness and being continually challenged, it suspended Ethan like the Symbolic Order does to the Imaginary (Conscious) Order when it feels threatened. But in the act of suspending and re-arranging Ethan, the Conscious of Yoh leaves one final blurb to suggest that it won’t even cooperate with Ethan and suggest that Ethan is Yoh now; the ultimate betrayal left at the gates, the abandoment of something it cannot subdue. Thus this supersession is not ascension in the negative sense, but instead a positive one: it just updates a current project in newer conditions. (Or to put into an example: imagine how contrasting free will and determinism were throughout the ages, especially when the first debates rose to now with all our philosophical wanking.)

Which leads to the smaller subject: emptyness or how it parallels the empty universe that Christians felt when Christ died on the cross. See, with all these religious metaphors and general theological theme, it needs not explaining. See the abandoment and forced assimilation carried out by the previous Yoh and Jesus’s crucifixion parallel each other on major themes. What matters really is the moment after: for Ethan, it confirms a Universe that has its creator singing creation without a Meaning; for Christ’s followers, it confirms that the Universe really is an empty one. And yet give both a seemingly hyprocritical yet lovely Kirekegaardian message; id est, their journey towards Faith did not end but instead strengthened. For both Ethan and the followers of Christ were knights that were infinitely resigned, for which these two cathartic events both had their effects on challenging what both knew what Faith to be. In the end, despite knowing the Universe to be empty, they hadn’t necessarily given up on what they did. And instead found their horizons expanded and, once more, renewed their journey to achieving the end of the Dialectic of Faith.

Through abandoment, our journeys just start anew.

Upvot’d and resteem’d.
A36CF0EB-CB5E-4C5B-B2BD-C39B0CF67E7A.gif

Sort:  

My studies of philosophy are too rusty to respond to this examination worthily, but I think that this little story of fiction, like many others, in the end betray a bit of my thinking and the key to the interpretation of the world I use.

Even if only wanting to write an end for the story of which I am not the author, and therefore I do not have the absolute freedom but I have to follow a plot already traced, and even if only wanting to be effective in 500 words, probably when I deal with issues like the search for meaning for life, I tend to show a bit of my approach, which is relativistic, materialistic and slightly nihilistic.

In fiction, Conscience of Yoh created Ethan as Ark for the memories of all sentient beings on Earth, and infused him with the impulse to search for him once the harvest was complete. For Conscience of Yoh this is the way to feed and grow, and Ethan does not understand that he is a mere instrument for his creator.

Ethan, being endowed with at least human intelligence, if not superior, has got a symbolic thought which, like in human beings, has caused the birth of questions of meaning and the conception of the divine. But, as for humans, the creation of this "symbolic father" can not save him from death.

As to quote Lacan in “Television: A challenge to the Psychoanalytic tradition”: “Thought is in disharmony with the Soul.”

On a different note, as I have said with paintings, writings to are a reflection of, directly, the author and, indirectly, society. The yearning for higher being, or a higher stage of existence, did and still haunts us that do consider and understand what uppercase F Fairh is. Even so, I rather stuck with Psychoanalysis and Søren Kierkegaard here in my comment due to the fact that Theology was the big theme while Scifi was merely a background (and modifier) of the theme. Even so, the reply back was fruiful and I can sense yer struggle which only is, dialectically, creating a stronger and better writer.

4941450B-A556-4436-A456-44E247EA343A.gif

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.12
JST 0.032
BTC 63241.83
ETH 3086.26
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.82