Problem for the subject - The nature of the public historical laws.

In the middle of the 19th century a new emergence of society and the intrusion of its laws arose, which led to an understanding of the social as a self-contained sphere of objective reality for which they are inherent specific and independent of the natural or divine laws of functioning and development. The specificity of public historical laws is manifested firstly in the fact that they, unlike natural laws, are implemented as laws of rational human activity.

image source

In the second place, this specificity is manifested in the opposite of the reductionism circumstance that these laws have an immanent rather than a transcendent, inherent in society, that they stand out as laws of collective human activity. This means that social life is not limited to a person's individual efforts, but includes as a whole the many mutually intertwining, conflicting and contradictory goals, aspirations and aspirations. But it is in this conflict of the numerous human wills and the resulting actions that the historical law is realized, what is inevitable for a certain stage of development and which usually expresses substantially the common in human effort. Thirdly, a specific feature of public historical laws is that they have an objective character, exist and act independently of the will of the individual.

This is due to the fact that one is not in a position to force others not to interfere with him, not to act, not to pursue his goals, and to ignore himself with himself. In the historical life, everyone acts in the name of their interests and desires, and does little to consider each other unless their goals coincide. That is why what comes to be the end result in history is a little bit responsive to the individual's individual expectations. Being a derivative of the various individual and collective wills, it presents itself to the single person as an independent, undesirable or not so desired wounded reality that subordinates it to itself and forces itself to conform to it. It is not important what a person does, what is important for what he / she is doing / why he does /.A distinctive feature of public historical laws is their procedural character, which means that they manifest themselves as law tendencies. In the literature, sometimes social-historical laws are identified with legal laws. So it is with the French enlighteners. In reality, however, these two types of laws do not match. There is a relationship of identity and difference between them.