Reportage street wave. Part 2

I would not call it a reportage street, but an aesthetic one! Indeed, there is a certain exactingness to the aesthetics of the frame in the reportage key.

There are exceptions in the form of certain topics related to some kind of pollution, garbage or other problems.

But then this unaesthetic will be the main key, the plot.

I think that spotted street is a completely unaesthetic genre, since its main idea is to collect the largest number of small details.

There are snowdrifts, scuffed walls and other dirt in use.

By the way, about the black snowdrifts! Is this reportage street? Yes, it is, but unaestetic. But because his main goal is just to show unsightliness.

There is another idea in the spotted street, but it is not material, but metaphysical.

If we show everyday life, everyday life with people, then everything should be beautiful.

In the classic street, too, everything is more or less aesthetically pleasing, even garbage can be beautiful there.

It turns out that only a reportage photo can show the real "trash".

The reporting is multifaceted, but this is because of the message and bias.

You need to show beauty – you only take off everything beautiful.

It is necessary to show trash and the problems associated with it – you show trash.

It seems to be honest, but on the other hand not so much. I know how the theme in the reportage works, how it enhances the image.

For example, there may be very few black snowdrifts or a puddle is not that big, but reporters can inflate a global problem out of this.

The most honest is still the classic street, where even if there is a puddle, it is only as a creative technique.