Math versus Mathamagic / Science versus Scientism

The scientific method is very strict. There is a established procedure when it comes to the scientific method just as there is with math. A absolute fact here is that both Math and the Scientific method require all the steps to be undertaken exactly as described or you are not doing either Math or Science. Something that most people are confused about. Lot's of people think that because of how strict both Math and the Scientific method is they cannot distinguish between Science and Scientism or Math and Mathamagic. In this post I am going to show anyone who knows how to use the operations + - X /, that is plus, minus, multiplication and division, how to know the difference between Math and Mathamagic. 

Such is a powerful tool for knowing when you are dealing with a Science versus Scientism.

A absolute here is that if you are not following the rules of Math, than your equations are not Math, but Mathamagic. Another absolute that is related to this truth about Math is that if your Math is Mathamagic than your Science is actually Scientism. Thus if you can learn to identify the difference between Math and Mathamagic you can also distinguish between Science and Scientism. So lets explore what a number symbol is.

A number symbol has parts. The first part is the symbol itself. The symbol itself is a representation of the amount of something. 

So 2 + 2 = 0 . 

So if we want a visual representation of what is going on here using Math symbol's see below.

So 2⁰ + 2^o = 0 because the symbol only holds the meaning of its value if there is a something.

There is no something that there is 2 of. So the symbol all by itself doesn't by itself create a something and thus the symbol 2 by itself logically and reasonably is actually the same value as 0. Thus the operation that 0 + 0 = 0 is what is true in reality. 

In Math there is a procedure for knowing when the symbol is by itself and has the value 0. It is called verifying and confirming. One merely has to identify the something and count how many somethings to know that the symbol matches the something in value.

Thus 2 ^pens + 2 ^pens = 4 ^pens

This works because the exponent always is a multiplication of the something by itself. No something according to the principal of multiplication means that the operation is multiplying zero and anything multiplied by zero will always = zero. In the above case we have pens and thus a true Math statement.

So what is true here is that the symbol is a representation of something and all by itself is merely potential.

In order for the symbol to represent it's value however there must be a something you can verify and confirm matches the value the symbol represents or the symbol's true value is 0. This is really an absolute in Math and whenever you cannot for any reason verify and confirm the symbol value as true, than also you cannot be doing math. Thus with this specific knowledge of the symbol relationships between the value a symbol represents and the truth in reality, that being able to verify and confirm how many somethings is matching the symbol value. So another truth here is if your equation says 

Thus 2 ^pens + 2 ^pens = 4 ^pens

But when you go to verify and confirm by counting the somethings and discover that you have 3 ^pens + 2 ^pens = 4 ^pens than in actual fact, the above equation does not match the sum 4 pens, thus making the equation false. So all equations in math are subject to the actually physical condition of the symbol matching reality. If it does not then it is Mathamagic and the only way you can know is to verify and confirm (true). Than verification and confirmation are absolutely necessary to verify and confirm that the equation is Math. So the following statement about Math is an Absolute.

All Math can be proved through verification and confirmation.

Conversely:

All mathamagic cannot be verified or confirmed.

Thus another way to say this is that in order to use the operations plus, minus, multiplication or division one has to know that the symbol value matches the reality. This is important because it is true about Science too. One has to know and thus know and it's specific meaning is important. So let's look at the definition of Know according to Merriam Webster

Definition of know

knew play   \ˈnü also ˈnyü\;   known play   \ˈnōn\;   knowing  transitive verb     1 a (1)  : to perceive directly : have direct cognition of        (2)  : to have understanding of                              

• importance of knowing oneself

(3)  : to recognize the nature of : discern       b (1)  : to recognize as being the same as something previously known   (2)  : to be acquainted or familiar with        (3)  : to have experience of             2 a  : to be aware of the truth or factuality of : be convinced or certain of          b  : to have a practical understanding of          

Source : Merriam Webster                    

I only know one way in which we can know things and that way is through our senses.

I cannot have a experience without my senses giving me the data that represents the experience. Thus Math and Science both rely on the observer's senses. If your senses can be demonstrated to have fooled you in a specific case it is through your senses that the data can be verified and confirmed to have fooled you. 

So it is easy to see that we have to bring the something into the preview of our senses in order to recognize the nature of: discern, to recognize as being the same as something previously known, to have experience of, to be aware of the truth or factuality of, be convinced or certain of or to have a practical understanding of and let me add the word "something" to all of this. 

Thus we come to another fact about all claims in science. When someone presents an equation there is an inherent claim that goes along with the idea that the equations are Math. That inherent claim is that it is Math and therefor the symbol's are provable as in verifiable and confirmable to be a Math equation that represents reality. So really if an equation is presented to you as Math all the symbol's that have the operations + - X /, that is plus, minus, multiplication or division, must also have had the symbol's verified and confirmed as representing something in fact, if not it is mathamagic.

So by now most of you are wondering how it is this knowledge will allow you to tell the difference between Math and Mathamagic and thus Science versus Scientism. Hopefully some have already figured this out. If you haven't don't feel bad, because all of us have been indoctrinated to the point that it is amazing that anyone can see what is true here. Instead of just telling you however what I am going to do is challenge each of you to verify and confirm that the symbols represent a something for the following mathamagic equation. Let us make the equation look like a Math Equation by calling the symbol 6.02^pens 

 (6.02^pens X 10²³) = 602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

Now verify and confirm that we have 602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,^pens

Equation Source : "Sciencing"

Article title: How to Find the Number of Atoms in an Element

I hope everyone see's that it is not possible for a human being to verify and confirm such a high number. Thus making the claim that this is math bogus and the science is also bogus too. So I went through all of this with my readers to make the following statement about the systemic liar's.

The truth is they are not lying to you about some things. In my opinion they are lying to you about everything.

This statement is true because if you have anything about reality that you merely believe is true it skews your senses in a way that means everything that you view is skewed. Is there anyone that doesn't know that the system is lying or wrong about things? If we are ever going to get back to a world view that is the least skewed, we must learn to tell the difference between what is real and what is not. Knowing the elements of what makes Math reflect reality versus when it is being used to bamboozle you is paramount. To provide food for thought I ask the following question. Does this mean that most of Science is B.S.? My answer should be easily discernible after reading this post.

All photos are from Pixabay.com. Screen shots are mine. I am not responsible for if you think, how you think, what you think or do. You Are!. If you like my content consider a up vote and follow! Peace!

A way to make free BTC and 4.08% interest in a BTC savings account.

Interested in joining or supporting the Information War?

Use tag  #informationwar to post your own stories about the lies and propaganda being pushed on the public.

@informationwar will up vote posts worthy of the cause.  

Join the discord: https://discord.gg/JsXbzFM chat with like minded individuals like myself and share your articles to receive additional support.  

Delegating Steem Power:   Another way you can support the cause is to delegate SP to @informationwar. 

Delegate 25 SP  

Delegate 50 SP  

Delegate 100 SP Note: remember to keep around 50SP in your account so you don't run into any bandwidth problems.  

How to delegate SP, join the fan base and more:   https://steemit.com/informationwar/@truthforce/you-can-make-a-difference-join-the-informationwar-and-help-support-others-today  

Find out more about the Information War. Click Banner!