crickets let me try again, maybe this time from a different angle:

You claim that this is a cultural genocide because consequently the victim has to be spectral like the victims of the drug users and despite that for millennia people have migrated just as they have used "drugs" and in America of all places, the cultural smelting pot, you insinuate that people of different cultures cannot live together side by side as they have been doing it for ever and as they have been doing it in Europe or that they aren't capable of deciding what to do with their body. Let me ask you this, if you have a right to stop people from crossing an imaginary border what stops someone else from ushering or welcoming people over? You see, not only doesn't anyone have a right to restrict others travels in public places, I have every right to invite people to those places. You can get up in arms about Christendom and can even call migrants invaders, and you can thirst for their blood should they not heed your "newspaper warnings", but you, and all other proponents of "legal" immigration won't have shit to say when confronted with someone questioning the idiocy of "it's not constitutional" or the complete lack of logic which comes with comparing a public place with a private one, or even more incredulous idiocy of claiming cultural genocide as if people haven't lived amongst each other for millennia while practicing different religions. All that will remain when such contentions come up is the sound of your silence.

Posted using Partiko Android