Uh oh...climate alarmists: YOUR WHOLE STORY IS FLAWED....Carbon dioxide doesn't cause warming.

Houston, we have a problem. The entire "global warming/climate change/quick!-kill off the people" milieu adopted by the United Nations' Malthusian alarmists and their fellow travelers throughout the global "scientific" community is based on a JUNK ASSUMPTION. A great new article points out that, so far as we can tell, whenever there has been a spike in global temperatures and a spike in the percentage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in close historical proximity to one another, that the temperatures went up BEFORE the carbon dioxide levels went up.

Uh oh...

And, of course, let's not forget that temperatures aren't actually going up anyway, and that the climate alarmists (masquerading as scientists) were caught discussing this unfortunate fact a few years ago, and they were caught in the process of coming up with the term "climate change" to (presto!) suddenly (and without so much as a hiccup) rename their entire propaganda milieu.

Here is the article:

https://www.technocracy.news/tim-ball-the-evidence-proves-that-co2-is-not-a-greenhouse-gas/

Here is a key excerpt from the link above:

"The most important assumption behind the AGW (anthropomorphic global warming) theory is that an increase in global atmospheric CO2 will cause an increase in the average annual global temperature. The problem is that in every record of temperature and CO2, the temperature changes first. Think about what I am saying. The basic assumption on which the entire theory that human activity is causing global warming or climate change is wrong. The questions are how did the false assumption develop and persist?

The answer is the IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change--a U.N. subgroup) needed the assumption as the basis for their claim that humans were causing catastrophic global warming for a political agenda. They did what all academics do and found a person who gave historical precedence to their theory. In this case, it was the work of Svante Arrhenius. The problem is he didn’t say what they claim."

Then you also need to see this little exchange of emails:

"The people controlling the AGW deception were aware of what was happening. Emails from 2004 leaked from the University of East Anglia revealed the concern. Nick at the Minns/Tyndall Centre that handled publicity for the climate story said, 'In my experience, global warming freezing is already a bit of a public relations problem with the media.'

Swedish climate expert on the IPCC Bo Kjellen replied, 'I agree with Nick that climate change might be a better labelling than global warming.'”

The article is pretty long and contains a lot more information as to how the carbon dioxide myth came to be, and how it has now been debunked, but I'll leave that to those who are more interested in the minutiae than I suspect most of my fellow Steemians probably are.

The key point is, YES...YOU ARE BEING LIED TO BY PEOPLE WHO ARE ON RECORD WANTING 90+% OF YOU DEAD.

I think that deserves some attention...

At least as much as their bogus/junk "science," anyway.