NGO's - Indonesia & a storm.
Never let a good crisis go to waste!
No matter what the event/disaster is a bank makes money, I heard from a banker that quote!
And Indonesia proves it beyond reasonable doubt. It also shines a light on NGO's (none governmental organizations) for being the corrupt organizations they are.
A lot of these NGO's are funded by George Soros, and he has used them to topple governments in the past, some countries now have banned his NGO's naming two for now Russia and Hungary, there are other countries though.
Other NGO's have been caught in child sex rings and prostitution as reported not long ago by the MSM in a rare case of honesty from them.
Lets start with the banks though before covering Haiti and tying in the rest.
As some of you may be aware, Indonesia was hit by earthquakes and a tsunami that hit the Lombok and Sulawesi islands killing thousands of people this past week. It has affected up to 150,000.00 people with homes ruined and people being displaced. There is also a massive shortage of fresh water, that leads to other disasters and disease.
Never fear, the World Bank sniffing an opportunity has stepped in to offer some cash, not for free though "oh no" that would be expecting way tooooo much for a banker. They instead are proposing a loan of 1 billion $'s. And unsurprisingly the Indonesians have turned it down, as with any loan comes interest, and they have no interest themselves in getting further in to debt!
Along with turning this loan down, they have also ordered all NGO's supposedly helping in the relief efforts to pack their bags and go home, and for that I say massive congrats to the Indonesians, based purely on NGO's past history at least. I mean who wants loads of supposed rescue workers having sex with all your young girls? Not Indonesia that is for sure.
You only have to look back at the Clinton's/red cross and Haiti to see why nobody in their right mind would want these peoples help. Red Cross raised $1/2 billion for Haiti – where did it go?
One of Hillary Clinton's friends was caught and put in prison for trafficking children from Haiti also, and I doubt very much she was alone in doing that, more like the one to take the fall. (Please take time to read that one if you have time.)
Source for my source if you like?.
Corrupt so called aid agencies and the like.
If you are interested in knowing how I came to form my opinion regarding NGO's etc covered in this post, please take time to read the links at the bottom of the post, and then you will see where I am coming from.
Over many years a lot of so called charities have been taking more for self, than sharing the proceeds to those they raised it for, so allow me to show you now below.
Lets start with the UN and child sex scandals that just keep on coming back time and time again.
red cross Multiple cases of fraud, deception and downright greed.
Soros has been the cause of much suffering around the world!
He has zero morals or compassion as shown in a video regarding him taking the possessions of other Jews during ww2, if you have not seen it youtube is the place. His NGO's have destroyed many a nation for profit for Soros and his friends. Even the Bank of England plus Thailand came in for some of his underhand treatment when he tried to destroy both currencies and forced the UK into over 10% interest rates (1992 UK 1997 Thailand), making it unbearable for anyone with a mortgage like me at the time.
Here is a pretty good read regarding Soros if you have the time.
Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11
Ways you can help the @informationwar
As per usual, thanks @commonlaw, much appreciated.
Will be curious to see where this goes as more information comes out. So far with all the whistle blowers it has continued on business as usual. I imagine this is why they appear to grow bolder. At some point the choice will have to be made by the community as to whether those entrusted to administer what is right is capable as so far it appears they have all been bought or frightened.
Thanks for all the links.
It is amazing is it not that it continues business as usual, even with all the information coming out.
I estimate we are 5 minutes past midnight regards to the latter, and the time is now for change.
Thanks for a as per usual top comment my friend.
When i here the name Soros i shudder for all the nasty stuff he does to peaple around the world.
The vile creature genuinely has no conscience, he only sees $ signs.
He should be dead soon, I hope.
He looks like he is almost dead anyway can not be far off i hope.
Probably drinks the blood of babies like most of them do, did you not see celebs boasting about getting injected with babies embryos earlier in the year?
Most likely as they tend to belive it helps to extent there lives by taking some inoccent babies life :( No i did not here that one about the celebs.
Take a read of this bro.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/celebrities-now-bragging-about-using-penis-skin-taken-from-babies-to-make-their-faces-look-younger/
Crazy they are.
Great news (for me) I fitted a new fan and my old laptop with my cryptos on it lives again, so now I have 4 laptops lol.
When disasters strike countries that are already a mess to begin with it's really hard to work under those conditions, those conditions being the countries, Haiti and Puerto Rico are ripe for corruption. The Red Cross handed off huge chunks of the money given them to other charities whom were more familiar working in that kind of environment. So now you not only have the Red Cross recouping their cost administrative wise, supply wise but you have a number of other organizations doing exactly the same thing, then those organizations go in and hire whom they think will get the job done and those people end up being corrupt. I am not saying the Red Cross is without blame but it more so leans towards it's lack of ability or expertise to perform that which is primarily outside of it's scope. They were never set up to rebuild communities in other words, their job is to go in and help people immediately following a disaster, when they stay within that focus you see there is no one arguing their success rate in that aspect. Now it might seem funny to you or I at first glance they'd take a big chuck and get themselves out of debt but you have to remember that that debt is occurred at the expense of continually all over the world having at ready available cots, food, water and volunteers to go in on a minutes notice to help save people. Do you realize the astronomical cost of that? Think about it once. Thousands of storage area's have to be maintained all over the globe, food ready at hand and replenished if it's not used within a specific amount of time, even bottled water is recommended to be replaced every six months. Then when you have a huge disaster that the whole world responds to and you collect astronomical amounts of money where you are left with a huge surplus then what do you do? You can't just hand it off to anybody so you set in place a motion to give it to on groups whom had their feet on the ground in countries like that forever...what else can they do? The best they can do is put it in the hands of those whom were recommended as having experience working with countries like that, sort of a best laid plans scenario, after that what is really expected of them? They did what was initially intended of them and they did it rather well, that's because that's their job and their good at it, beyond that they have no control if the money has been entrusted to what came recommended to them as reputable firms to disburse the remainder of the funds to the benefit of those whom it was intended for, I think people miss that point, it's not their job to rebuild places, it's their job to take care of people immediately in the aftermath and they are damn good at it.
OKAY lets stick with just the red cross for now, I only like to present info I can back up, hence using what most people trust in the msm.
For a start in the UK (I can not speak for other countries) The haiti disaster fund was begged for with the promise of rebuilding peoples homes in Haiti yes? How many were built from the 500 million $ raised? 6. That is not a failure it is a complete waste of raised funds Source
A quarter of the 500 million raised, $125 million was spent of that money on the red cross own internal expenses Source Which contradicts your figures that it was "other" organizations expenses or anything to do with storing food.
I could do a whole article or 10 just on the red cross alone if you like?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/red-cross-ceo-addresses-criticism-of-how-funds-are-used/
Internal expenses means just that, internal, that's means replenishing depleted stocks of items, cost of faring people back and forth, security provided to volunteers (I know they provide security because I have a friend who has gone on a couple of missions for them, it's because they send these volunteers into unstable environments.
Lacking the expertise to mount its own projects, the Red Cross ended up giving much of the money to other groups to do the work. Those groups took out a piece of every dollar to cover overhead and management. Even on the projects done by others, the Red Cross had its own significant expenses – in one case, adding up to a third of the project’s budget.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/04/red-cross-haiti-report_n_7511080.html
There are other articles out there I have seen over time that get a bit more detailed, some even giving names of those convicted of taking some of the funds and using them for personal use. I am not saying the red cross does everything in a exculpatory manner, I think things would be a lot worse if they weren't there, in instances where money is raised above and beyond their core mission I think more regulatory oversight should be in place, such as requiring them to have organizations that are verified and in place for quick action when these types of funds exceed what is required of them.
There's no way I could argue that some view disasters as money making events in some people's eyes, we just have to look at the Clintons Foundation and what transpired with those funds that Bill Clinton was supposed to disperse in Haiti. In all reality it's pretty harsh when it comes down to places using the money for other then what it's intended for. Would I say I have any great expectation outside of a feel good moment of donating money when the reality may actually fall to a bunch of despots whose real thoughts behind getting the money is to keep it for themselves while in the back of their minds they justify it as these people were already living in squalor conditions why should they expect any better afterwards. Sad really, but when it comes to money people are really selfish.