RE: Racism is one of the funniest scam's. So I draw a battle line for informationwar. Stop supporting the liars.
What does the concept of "equality of opportunity" mean? Is it to disburse "opportunity" evenly across the demographic? If so, can such situation be even considered "opportunity"? All men are born unequal and live under unequal situations, thus, generating disparate opportunities for all men. An example of "equal opportunity" seems to me the segregated sports leagues that existed in the US, during the early 1900s, as both Whites and Blacks were granted "equal" opportunity to be in athletic industry.
I do agree that men's differences do strengthen society, rather than harm the sociocultural matrix. The recognition that certain breeds excel at certain fields allows for men to pursue their strengths, rather than waste resources (both theirs and society's) chasing delusions. Life is unequal; forcing equality upon reality inevitably results in tragic outcomes.
All men are born equal. That doesn't mean that they all have the same skill's It means they are all equally men. Let us not mix apples and oranges. Skills of individuals is not what is being put forth with the phrase all men are born equal. They are not speaking about being born with equal inheritance or any other nocky monkey thing that can be thought up. They are saying that all men where created by God and have equal importance to God.
They mean that men are not slaves. That is why they have breed humans to be atheist. So they could have slaves. For if there is no God then there is no equality and no reason to treat men as men nor no reason not to have slaves. Nor a reason to have rights, nor a reason to reach for the star's. After all the divide and concur has always been about slavery versus liberty.
That is why the slaver's always seek to separate us with stupid things like Racism.
Indeed, all creatures are "equal" before their creator as created beings, imperfect and under obligation, but the humanist drivel of equality of men is formulated with the intent of fomenting rebellion. It is with this concept, born from ignorance and hubris, that a gang of merchants, rice farmers, and tobacco peddlers rebelled against their rightful lord and master in the colonies. Rebellion is anti-Christian; thus, to invoke God to discuss the humanist drivel of equality is misleading and inaccurate. One of the central messages of Christianity is to bear suffering of this world with grace; when the Christian God was crucified unjustly, how much more so would His servants? Or do you mean the humanist "god," or rather "goddess," of Reason, when discussing the divine?
It is the condition of men that they be subject to masters and lords. All man has, is the choice to either serve his creator God, or his worldly masters. The humanist drivel of "freedom" and "equality" has brought more misery, suffering, and death to this world than any other toxic concept devised by the evil hearts of men. Man ought to know and accept his station in life.
Yeah the problem is you can't get the lords and master's to comprehend or understand that.
Yep there is only one station for mankind That is as the created. All the drivel that comes after is mankind's drivel. It is the condition of lords and master that they are subject to God as is everyone. Least God tell all others to rid themselves of the Lords and Master one would think that being good at it would be a priority. Yet one can easily see that is not the case. So you recognize God as the creator. Does he recognize your lords and masters.
It is OK for people to know their place, it isn't OK for others to try to supplant God and tell others what their place is. That is more dangerous than the telling of others what their place is. In mine own mind it would also prove the falsity of claiming to be the lord or the master.
The First Principle of Sovereignty is that he who claims to be Sovereign must first act like a Sovereign; otherwise, by his own hand he makes a false claim.
By M. Kenneth Creamer
so then
Sublata causa tollitur effectus Remove the cause and the effect will cease. 2 Bl. C
om. 203.
This is exactly what you are saying, when you say men not knowing their station has caused more death and destruction than any other cause. Mere men always think it will be they who remove the cause. Matters not whether the mere man is lord and master or slave.
We are in agreement. All men are subject to obligation toward their creator God. When men forget or ignore this fundamental truth, they become less than beasts. The mad King Louis, fourteenth of that name, could not even master his passions and behaved worse than a 2-year old for the most of his pathetic life. His life is a monumental example of human failure and ought to serve as a warning to any who imagine themselves in position of rulership. Similarly, the dregs who overthrew the established social order to usher in the terrible orgy of blood that was the French Revolution ought to serve as a warning for those who discuss "reform."
Without considering the will of the creator, man blindly stumbles into the abyss of their own creation. True freedom is gained when man has mastered his passions, through mastery of God's laws that have become his second nature, that he can live unshackled from the fleeting material pleasures of this world. Man without obligation to his God has no purpose and is as useless as a broken hammer.