You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is This What Bird Box Warned us About?
Thx for the feedback @builderofcastles!
I'm curious about what arguments, or
statements, you found to be not factual.
Thx for the feedback @builderofcastles!
I'm curious about what arguments, or
statements, you found to be not factual.
measurements of whether EM radiation hurts you is based on seeing if it adversely heats the body too much. Of course, if it cooks the body, it is very bad, but before that point, it really only matters if the body can shunt the heat fast enough. So, it is a bad measure for damage.
Further
440 Hz has serious impact on people, that they never realize.
432 Hz is far more soothing and uplifting.
But, these are just in the realm of "feelings" right now.
Nothing is really quantified. Nothing has really been studied.
So, a 5G network, properly tuned could help out people.
A 5G network designed to destroy people requires almost any other frequency. (so basically, its easy to be bad, hard to be good)
We have very little knowledge about frequencies.
Lastly, cancer isn't what people think it is.
Cancer is an emotional disease.
If i do not cure the underlying emotion, than there is nothing i can do about the cancer.
Cure the emotion and the cancer will often disappear.
Don't cure the emotion, but physically remove the cancer, the cancer will reappear.
So, the real cause of why 5G is bad, is the same as having uninsulated / uncovered water pipes. The pipes give off a sub-hearing noise, that makes all hearing it tense. Giving people nightmares and causes people to see thing. In effect, something that is outside of human hearing range (and so, often ignored by science) is a direct cause, while those things being measured have no bearing on the situation.
Thx for sharing your thoughts on
frequency, EM radiation, and or 5G!
It's always good to get your take!