RE: Donald Marshall on Child Cloning, Sexual Abuse and Torture
I don't think there is any doubt that cloning, sexual abuse, molestation and sex slaves exist. One thing I do doubt is the idea of the so-called "vrill".
If we learn that the vrill don't exist, would that make us seem foolish for giving Donald Marshall so much of our attention?
Is it possible by giving Donald Marshall so much attention that it might cause some people to think that cloning, sexual abuse, molestation and sex slaves do not exist?
Might they possibly end up associating those things in their minds with "crazy conspiracy theories", causing them to be blinded to the truth of things that are easily provable?
At some point I can envision the mainstream media conflating Donald Marshall's conspiratorial claims with #pedogate in an attempt to debunk the idea of modern day satanic ritual abuse.
It actually wouldn't be very hard for them to ridicule the Donald Marshall claims and then paint people who think that SRA is a world wide epidemic as "crazy conspiracy theorists".
If you've been paying attention to the news, right now their current focus is flat earthers, another group that has made themselves easy prey.
It's a fallacy to ignore things that are true without researching it to verify it, simply because something else is unverifiable and seemed ludicrous or false. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater is not a proper methodology for figuring things out. If people dismiss things without investigation, as simply being "nutjob conspiracy theories", then that speaks more about their own mindset and level of thinking.
No one has to look at anything I post, or that others post. I don't claim anything he says is true here, but do relate what he claims happens to other historical things like medieval torture, and fiction in movies. It could all be fiction what he says about what his life has been... I can still talk about it ;) Others can still learn about the knowledge, it doesn't make it true.
Flat earthers have been associated with conspiracy thinking and have indeed polluted the waters so to speak, but that doesn't mean all conspiracies are false either ;) Thanks for the feedback.
I agree with you. Yet, for whatever reason the media is able to successfully over and over again use straw man arguments in such a way that they are able to either whitewash real events, or condition people to apprehend them with less seriousness than the situation requires.
Well, to be fair you switch from reporting what he said to speaking matter of factly about his claimsfor a moment. I can tell he's got you on the fence a bit.
Rather than say claims, alleges, etc all the time, I just repeated what he said, sorry for the lack of specific clarity ;) I don't know what he says it true. It's one person saying it. I'm repeating his account of things ;)
I feel ya, it probably would get tedious to repeat over and over.