You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The channel I spent the most time watching on youtube that was banned has a home that works just as well on bitchute...
I know, I'm so sick of people crying for Jones. He's not dead or wiped from the internet (yet). I understand the danger of what FB and GULAG are doing, but some people need to get ahold of themselves. Just go in Infowars from now on or Bitchute!! ;) Thx for your attention to this.
I understand the anger. It is more than a slippery slope. It is blatant and bad news whether people like Jones or not.
Yet, yes my main goal was to let people know alternatives as I stumble upon them.
Real.Video is archiving a lot of their material too.
Good to know! I still think Jones is just controlled opposition. Made to be an example of. So very hard to digest all this properly, if there is such a way...
I don't consider him controlled opposition... I suspect it is the opposition planting that so some people that see controlled opposition everywhere discount him. He invites guests from pretty much everywhere and let's them have their say. He seems very human to me complete with flaws.
EDIT: Though I've seen guests intentionally plant stories in interviews before. So I do think the controlled opposition occasionally makes it on his show. Robert David Steele throwing in the "Child Slaves on Mars" bit at the end of an interview and then Alex getting defamed saying he spoke about "Child Slaves on Mars" when it wasn't him, but his guest.
Yeah RDS is out there and is ex-CIA. Same things w/having Lyndon Larouche on etc....I'm not saying Jones is "in"on it, just think he at best is a useful idiot. I used to watch infowars when I cut my teeth on the alt-media and will always have a special place for Jones. All that aside he doesn't touch on the big issues and is constantly over-hyping events that lead to nothing. It must be exhausting to watch his channel.
All that said I just subbed to Jones' channel on Bitchute and will also sub him if he ever comes to STEEM!
Well he also has more anchors than himself. Each of them quite different. I like David Knight quite a bit. So while they attack Alex Jones, his outlet has been bigger than just him for awhile with different personalities and styles. His is the most flamboyant of them all. And yes he can waste most of a show in some cases ranting... then some days he doesn't. Hit and miss. And yes, I know most of the things he talks about. I listen for those occasional new things that get dropped and are like a bread crumb to start my own research.
EDIT: Plus, I am not so sure we would be having this conversation if it was not for him. I think he has pushed a lot of the would be plans into the limelight with his audience and it has in some cases been partially responsible for foiling them. I highly suspect without him Hillary would have won, and what we've been seeing happening in Europe would have been happening here and things would have been very bad. Not saying they are good now. Yet, there is hope.
You make a good point. W/out Jones who knows where we'd be right now. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I think there comes a time when you just outgrow his antics, and his focus is definently lacking in places where he should be focused IMO. The world is for sure a better place w/Jones at a mic.
p.s. I'm starting to think all of this might actually be good for Jones' career in the short term. You know, "no such thing as bad press." Infowars google searches are way up last couple of days. ;)
Yes. Banning stuff doesn't ever really work as far as I can tell. Just creates more of it. People are fascinated by the taboo. It starts even with us as young children.
I also heard that they were doing something to "Q's" Twitter account and "they" didn't want that bad press, so they started picking on Jones' and the media ran w/it to deflect from the Q stuff. Who fucking knows I guess. That's how disinfo campaigns work!