But when someone shows up on television and YouTube, you don't have a personal relationship with them. So (1) you don't have any way to know they're good and deserving of trust and (2) your support isn't relevant or nourishing to them anyways.

again this is just amazing the way you elucidate your point and try to examine from as neutral a standpoint as possible. I definitely agree with the above.

Like I said I haven't really been following the affair cos headache prevention lol so i don't know what evidence has been provided or whatnot, (only thing I know the judge had a hysteric breakdown or something), but definitely the first thing anyone should do is examine shit from a skeptcical place. Seriously that's the way every thing should be approached. Even sometimes with family haha.

Also...great casino allusion!