known to be younger than 170 million years old (although how much younger isn't known).
That's weird! Won't their tests do younger than that? Or is it that Google earth haven't updated their satalite images yet? Lol
known to be younger than 170 million years old (although how much younger isn't known).
That's weird! Won't their tests do younger than that? Or is it that Google earth haven't updated their satalite images yet? Lol
I asked my cousin who is a geologist about that, she said it was due to the relative timing of the surrounding host rock. Also that it appeared there had been no actual geochemical dating done. In other words, lets just blame Google, its easier...