Leaders do not always care about citizens

Despite the worrying reassurances that come from politicians who are not always reliable, the Iranian citizens seem to suffer from financial difficulties that will only worsen in the coming weeks and months.

After the firing of ballistic missiles a few days ago, I do not think that there will be prosperity or prosperity for the Persians, since their rulers prefer to throw billions on developing weapons, financing terrorists in remote areas and paying for digging tunnels with Gazans and Lebanese, not to mention the supply of expensive equipment that is sometimes destroyed On dark nights at the Syrians.

As a result of the price of debt, the financing of harmful terrorists, and the supply of dangerous and expensive military equipment to extremist factions, the world will impose more antitrust on the prizes, which are no longer thriving, not to mention a few butterflies and occasionally suppressed by riots of hungry or angry citizens.
.
I wonder if all Iranian citizens are happy that their government is wasting public funds instead of helping the residents? Oh, wait, I forgot, the Babylonians are not really democrats, they are just captives in the hands of a gang of murderous and religious believers. Why should rulers in such regimes ever care about the residents, what do they think and feel? A similar situation exists among the Gazans, so things are familiar. If the residents suffer the leaders accuse the Jews, and everyone immediately forgives the officials.
.
Theoretically only in democratic regimes politicians listen to citizens. Here, for example, the rulers especially listen to citizens who are robber and anti-Zionist assailants in blacks and blackmailers and nationalists. The rest are boring and uninteresting. Unfortunately, it seems that neither the elderly nor the disabled and even the faithful supporters who only want hospitals for the children, the wounded and the elderly are not really considered worthy.
.
It seems to me that what is most interesting is the local authority, whose ostensible sin is only to remain in power, and all the totally unqualified means are capable of achieving the supreme goal of holding on to it.
.
Probably because they feel elevated, special, strong and superior, the economic situation or the fate of the residents are much less important to the rulers than the preservation of their ability to control others. Apparently for this reason, they have no problem wasting the residents' money, since they themselves do not lack cash.