You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Tortured "complexity"
You seem to be confusing social structures with anti-social structures (government). Government is the opposite of society, in every instance. Good trick they played getting people to confuse the two, though.
Anarchy won't lead to Utopia. Nothing will. In fact, your whole argument is the long-discredited "But wouldn't warlords take over?" objection.
Cling to theft and aggression if that's what you prefer. I won't stop you. All I insist is that you stay out of my way.
No.
Since you linked to Mises, I'll explain a property of markets that you won't find from him. It comes from network and game theory. 'Free markets' are not the stable state of markets. They are a transitory state of immature, developing market. Given enough time all markets converge to direct or collusive monopolies.
Since talking to you is mostly just an exercise where you randomly list bumper-sticker ideas with little understanding and then you misconstrue positions into some low-effort cliche so you can emit canned responses, there is no further value communicating with you.
A monopoly is impossible to maintain without the State. I would explain the reasons, but since you'd prefer to run away...