Gimmicks and Books
Some names are so great, the reputation of the owner of the fame has not been, the reader does not matter a lot.
When I think of this, I remember George Bernard Shaw. Although his anecdotes and poems are very famous, he died in 1950, and he still enters into several anthologies of prominent, masterpiece.
Sometimes a subtle humor, sometimes with mockery and disdain, was once decorated with the old generation's experiments; He was a unique resource for people who like to write books by not having much writing skills but by compiling them.
Actually, he wrote Shaw playwright, near fifty games, novels without success. But those who like to see his angry words and sell them at crowded meetings do not know that Pygmalion is his game, for example. George Bernard Shaw's reputation has shadowed his writings.
Or think of Goethe. Even in secondary school curriculum programs, the name is passed, is part of the reading, has been asked even in university exams. But most of the readers, too troublesome, but Faust remembers, I'm not sure that gives the answer.
Some writers have written dozens of books, but the name of one of them and the name of the author are equivalent to each other. I think it's unfortunate for a writer. If only a single decal would be given, why did I write the others? Acak I think it would be the authors.
For example, the average literary reader comes up with a single book. Let's not be because the majority of readers have read, but because their names are interesting.
Posted from my blog with SteemPress : https://buggersteemit.000webhostapp.com/2018/10/gimmicks-and-books