If we're talking about marriage before the age of consent (18 in most places), then I would say, no, it's not very good, except maybe where both would be spouses are mature enough to do so (however that might be adequately determined), and particularly when a baby (or out of wedlock pregnancy) is involved. Otherwise, it's generally best to wait.
However, that doesn't mean that people need to wait until certain lifestyle conditions are met to be married. In a lot of cases, a person could get married at 21, start their family and do well. There is a certain amount of maturity that is required to have a successful marriage, and age can't always determine that, but waiting until all conditions are met, including a firm financial foundation, is denying some maturity and growth that can only come through facing adversity. And that adversity would be better served being gone through together, rather than separately.
I was married at 22. My wife was considerably older, so it's probably good that we got married when we did. Now, we just celebrated our 30th wedding anniversary. We have two sons, who are now married and have children of their own. It can be done, but certain conditions need to be met, and both parties need to be willing to go through all kinds of things to make it work, regardless of the age that they decide to do it at.
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
If we're talking about marriage before the age of consent (18 in most places), then I would say, no, it's not very good, except maybe where both would be spouses are mature enough to do so (however that might be adequately determined), and particularly when a baby (or out of wedlock pregnancy) is involved. Otherwise, it's generally best to wait.
However, that doesn't mean that people need to wait until certain lifestyle conditions are met to be married. In a lot of cases, a person could get married at 21, start their family and do well. There is a certain amount of maturity that is required to have a successful marriage, and age can't always determine that, but waiting until all conditions are met, including a firm financial foundation, is denying some maturity and growth that can only come through facing adversity. And that adversity would be better served being gone through together, rather than separately.
I was married at 22. My wife was considerably older, so it's probably good that we got married when we did. Now, we just celebrated our 30th wedding anniversary. We have two sons, who are now married and have children of their own. It can be done, but certain conditions need to be met, and both parties need to be willing to go through all kinds of things to make it work, regardless of the age that they decide to do it at.
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io