You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: La Zona Mas Extraña del Oceano by NatGeo
@guiltyparties Ok again, it is not about curation rewards! It is about your name on a shitpost supporting a person who abuses women, abuses other stemians, Who uses private photos of stemians with defamatory messages. This reflects bad on you as a witness! I get it is an autovote but it still reflects bad on you. If the system does this it needs to be changed! You have my witness vote you had it for a while now , voting for a witness who has his name on the content of a known sexual predator also reflects on me badly. do you see how this affects everything including the platform we both care about ? saying you cannot change it is not enough , something needs to happen!
I understand your concern. Me being a witness is just me running a server that processes blocks and having the joy of having to stay up all night updating it when there's a crash. I'll think on what can be done. Editing the bot for this case is not possible as it must show the bad with the good, otherwise it won't present an accurate snapshot.
It seems to me that in the end, it's not just this list that no one reads that's being discussed here. The community over the last half a year increasingly wanted to eliminate content that it dislikes, similar to Twitter and Reddit. This is a larger discussion that should be had with Steemit Inc if that's indeed the case.