Russia as a criminal imperialist

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shweigo said his country had broken up revolutions in the Middle East and Africa. He admits that the brutality of Russia in Syria is what broke the Arab revolutions. There is no doubt that Syria was the place where the revolutions had to be broken, after the American policy of bypassing the revolution failed, and the military intervention in Libya did not stop. The nature of the brutal regime was appropriate for Syria to be the best place for that.
This is what America wanted, which decided to distort the revolution, and give the regime the justification for accusing it of being connected to abroad. This is what Saudi Arabia wanted, which feared the revolution would spread to it. It supported the regime in secret and carried out its strategy in the face of the revolution (as indicated by Bashar al-Assad himself). This was the position of the imperialist capital in its entirety, which was expressed by its media, which, from the outset, distorted the revolution as a civil war and sectarian conflict, and then terrorism. Iran wanted to control and crush the revolution, lest it be repeated after the Green Revolution of 2009. Russia was also terrified of the revolutions and at the same time wanted to intervene to impose its presence in the Middle East.
Each played a role in crushing the revolution and stopping the expansion of the revolutionary tide that had begun in Tunisia, fueling and distorting the conflict. But Russia alone has brought up a crushing mission
"Russia implements the will of imperialist capital, and can not reap the results in its favor" revolution and break the Arab revolutions. On behalf of all these people played the most dangerous and brutal role to crush the revolution in Syria. Has returned to its cesarean role in being the bastion of reaction in Europe during the revolutions of 1848/181. This is the summary of Schweigau's statement. It summarizes the position of capitalism as a whole and explains that it is Russia that has carried out the will of this capitalism. Russia, therefore, is the dirty tool of capitalist tyranny, aware of it, and knows that it is doing the job.
This is reminiscent of the brutal bombardment of Russian airliners in the eastern Gauta, the Russian decision to surrender the "insurgents," and the repetition of what happened in Aleppo, where brutality led to the displacement of the people and the deportation of the fighters. He explains that the Russian military decision is to crush the revolution, not to achieve "peace" through negotiations, and that all the forms that Russia proposes to negotiate, from Geneva to Astana to Sochi, are only "gaining time" in a policy based on the liquidation of the sites of the revolution, After the other.
Here, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is a sponsor of peace in Syria, but wants to impose his peace. That is why Schweiggo is a signatory to this "peace" which can only be achieved through genocide. This is what the Russians practiced in Chechnya, and they support those who practice it in eastern Ukraine. They suffer from a lack of ability to win, so they try to convince themselves that they are winning, even if the people are besieged with light weapons, without support. They want to impose their will, which is based on their decision that should be imposed, and they want a solution that keeps Bashar Assad, after crushing the revolution, and then can involve new clients in a government under their control. With their military presence, they have signed agreements allowing them to establish military bases, with forty-four to seventy-four years.
What is the meaning of this? What bloody do they do? Not forgetting that they are doing all this on behalf of all the imperialists, those who want to crush revolutions and commit massacres to intimidate people so that they do not think of revolution at any time. The Russians are ready to do so, and they are doing so well, because they have the latest weapons, many of which they have tried for the first time at the head of the Syrian people. Is it better than that to plot American, European, Chinese, and other imperialism? It is the hands of imperial Russia that are contaminated with all this blood in Syria, appear in this brutality and sink into a swamp where they can be caught. Where imperialism grapples with the bodies of the peoples of the Middle East, where each wants to achieve its own interests, regardless of the bodies and blood of the Syrians.
Shweigo is the head of the brutal attack in Syria, who drew up plans to "crush the revolution" and wanted to "break the Arab revolutions", which is deeply reflective of the policy of Vladimir Putin,
"The Russian military decision is to crush the revolution, not to achieve" peace "through negotiations, for its sadistic tendencies, the tendencies that are establishing a new fascism imposed by the predicament of Russian capital, which wants to dominate nations and seize markets to rise and replace American capital. , It is the opposite of Chinese capital, can not compete in an open world market. That is why he chooses to dominate by force, believing he is capable of doing so. That is why I believe that the situation in Syria is being exploited in order to advance under the pretext of "international legitimacy" and "national sovereignty", impose its occupation and extend its control. Without realizing that it is implementing imperialist policy as a whole, and that, at the same time, it is drifting towards the "trap". What he wants more than he can, and his ability to crush the revolution does not qualify him to establish a system that can stand on his feet, or continue to exist. Precisely because the revolution wants to uproot it, and that all the course of the conflict imposed that it is not possible to rebuild the regime, even if it wins the power of the Russians and Iran and all the sectarian militias that mobilize them, and all the security companies that bring them. The regime is unable to continue anyway. If Russia decides to continue its military presence in order to have a foot on it, it will fall into a "new Afghanistan", first as a result of the ability of the Syrian people to continue the struggle against the regime and all the occupiers. Second, because global competition will take advantage of this presence to weaken Russia and lead it to a quagmire that will force it to forget the dream of world leadership.
Russia is stupid imperialism, it is carrying out the will of imperialist capital, but it can not reap results in its favor. It is working to crush the revolution and break the Arab revolutionary path, but it will not be able to reap its own interests, and may sink in the face of the imposition of its oppression. Neither Schuigo's crime is useful, nor is Putin's rhetoric useful, nor does all technological development allow the crushing of a revolution decided by a people.