You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Israel Is Always Growing, Here are Maps and Some News
Ethnic Cleansing? Give me a break twenty percent of Israel's population is Arab. The Arabs are the only ones guilty of ethnic cleansing, how many jews are left in Lebanon?
Oh yeah a growing population over time = not ethnic cleansing.
I didn't mean to use that map. However, looking at say 1915, let's say there were 97% Other Semite, Arab and Other Middle Eastern and that 97% were either Christian or Muslim. I'm not saying there weren't Jewish sleeper cells. Of course, there were and, there are plenty of Jews that pretend to be Muslim or Christian and have done so for generations - like the Jews who pretended to be Turkish and as the "Young Turks" orchestrated the genocide of at least 1 million Christians in Armenia.
Today, you say Israel is 20% Arab. Where is the other 77% and why did they leave???
Which map? The one showing that the Arabs got %78 of Palestine, yeah I could see why you wouldn't want to show that one. Kind of screws with your Poor Arab story.
The other %77 are in the other %78 of british mandate palestine which we now call Jordan.
Source for the Young Turks being Jewish?
That was never Palestine, the land appropriated and agreed on by The Allies for the State of Palestine. You seem to have switched your argument for what was allocated by the British in The Mandate for Palestine which I believe was all of that land including what is now mostly Israeli. As far as I know the British allocated the land twice: in a letter to a Rothschild in 1917 or earlier and then to those in the area of The Mandate for Palestine in 1920.
I will not, however, argue anything with anyone who wants to change definitions in midstream. That shows they have no problem arguing in bad faith. It seems that's how you want to argue.
Furthermore, if you don't know the pre-war U.N. Mandate map is what Palestine was and is in contention, you shouldn't be arguing period.
I would even consider giving you 1967 lines for the argument but not now that you want to call British Mandate lines. I can't say I even know the history back that far.
If those people involved with the expansion of Israeli Territory were honest in their territorial ambitions, I'd be a lot more amicable to it. I don't want to hear 6 million lies 6 million times while the Israeli play is to really break those other people's morale and force as many out by attrition, annexation or violence as they can while playing the victim. It is an all too common ethnic play i.e. the 18-20 something year old in Israel that called 100+(?) Jewish Centers here in the U.S. to menace and threaten whoever answered the phone.
Nothing was ever palestine, never a country, never a people, their called Arabs.
I never switched anything, I always say "From the Jordan to the sea, Israel will be free!'
Your 1948 lines were offered in 1948 but instead the Arabs chose war and lost.
Just like the Germans of the Sudetenland they should have been driven out.
I don't give a f^ck about whiny jews or whiny arabs those socialists can piss up a rope and lick the wet end, no whining here.
So, I guess the Romans never took the land and called it Palestine and the people just materialized there?
They're not all Arabs.
and you're not arguing in good faith. It doesn't seem like you know how to. That's why your correspodence decayed into petulance.
Jordan to the Sea? It don't matter. I know where the devils reside for eternity.
A roman province does not a nation make.
Petulance? Not arguing in good faith? Just presenting my opinion and reasons for it.
Are you a postmodernist?
Cromwellian Monarchist, are you a National Socialist?