You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Future is Female: U.S. Election Results - many firsts!

in #news • 5 years ago

You did a wonderful job of covering this distraction. Because that is all this election and every other election is; a distraction from what is really taking place. The people of the United States of America for the most part do not have a clue about our "true government" and I hate to say it but you don't either if you think this is a big deal that these women were elected.
The fact of the matter is that none of the elected officials in Washigton DC , including the president, have ever taken the proper oaths of office to hold those offices they were elected too. I will also guarantee you that these newcomers will also not take the proper oath needed to be a member of the government of the United States of America, they may take an oath and they will, but that would make them a member of the US government and there is a difference despite most peoples lack of knowledge of this.
So while this all seems like a grand thing, the big picture of what is really taking place in this country is still hidden in plain sight and not many people are even aware of it.
I won't say any more and but you really need to look at history to understand that we are not operating as the country that was founded under the constitution, and we operate as a bankrupt corporation that is a de-facto government made to mimic what was created.

5 years ago in #news by
$0.00
    Reply 17
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     5 years ago 

    Interesting points here @sultnpapper. I was watching a documentary just a few days ago regarding our banking system here and how it too is not what people think it is. It even goes beyond being based on fiat currency and all the way to simply printing money from thin air whenever the Fed decides the time is right.

    My question regarding the oaths is this: if the oaths being taken are accepted by the old and new members of each party as well as by the members of the public, how does that make the oaths not legitimate? It seems as though as long as the intent is the same, the wording could change substantially and it wouldn't make a difference. Words are important though, so I'm curious as to your take on it.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       5 years ago 

      Thanks for that question, @mattifer, I was wondering similarly about what you mean about “proper oaths". I do agree with you @sultnpapper that for the most part the whole system is riddled with issues, and that many politicians may not be treating their oaths with the honor these pledges deserve.

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         5 years ago 

        The oath that none of the elected officials take is the one that simply states, that the person will support the constitution. It is the very first statute passed by the first congress of the United States of America, but most people don't understand that the constitution has been suspended. That is why that oath is not given, they know damn well that they (elected officials) are not following the constitution. If they were given that oath and had any character at all they would have to admit that everything you are seeing and witnessing is nothing more than an acting job while they are screwing us left and right.
        So by "proper oaths" I mean the oaths that are required to hold an office in the government of the United States of America.
        That oath is required of all the elected officials in Washington, there are other oaths that are also required for specific offices such as president. tRump is not the president of the United States of America, he did not take the two oaths required to become president. He took one oath and that might be good enough to be president of the bankrupt corporation known as the US or US government but there is a difference between that and the United States of America.

        $0.03
        • Past Payouts $0.03, 0.00 TRX
        • - Author $0.02, 0.00 TRX
        • - Curators $0.01, 0.00 TRX
        2 votes
        Reply
        [-]
         5 years ago 

        This is really interesting - thanks for taking the time to tell me more - I didn’t realize there was this intricacy to what people are saying when they take office. I’m going to do some more research now that I know what I don’t know!

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           5 years ago 

          It really is amazing how much we don't know that we think we know. The congressional records are a great place to find a lot of information about how things really are. I have done several Daily Doses about these subjects and will continue to do so as time allows me, but right now I am really pressed for time or I would go grab a couple links from those. You will be amazed at what you will learn though.

          $0.00
            Reply
            [-]
             5 years ago 

            I am glad you taking an interest in the banking system and learning. I hope that you also learned that the Fed is not part of the government, despite the name Federal Reserve Bank, it is a privately held corporation formed by the major banks back in the early 1900's and has remained privately held since then.
            If you want an interesting read about "our" banking system go online and find the Federal Reserve Bank's employee training manual titled "Modern Money Mechanics" and learn for yourself that a bank has no risk when they "loan money".
            First there is no money. Secondly, the banks can't loan anything they have on deposit. So what they are doing is acting as if they loan you something and the funds are actually created by your signature on the "loan documents". They use a process called double entry book keeping, and while I won't go into all the specifics of it here, just know that at the end of each day they have to balance their books. They do this by creating the money with your signature and opening an account in your name. On was side of ledger is a debit for the amount of money you got and other side of the ledger is a credit for the same amount. The only problem is that these loans have you paying interest on them and nowhere is the interest money created. That is how the people and government have ended up over $23 trillion in debt, is because that money was never created it was agreed upon that you would pay interest, now you have to find somewhere to get it from.
            This whole system is a house of cards waiting for a big wind storm to blow it all down. I hope that the documentary you watched explained that the only lawful money in the United States of America is gold and silver coin. We have no lawful money any longer, we have a "money" substitute known as legal tender, it is not lawful money.
            I answered the part of your questions about oaths in the comment to @lilyraabe , I hope that answer will explain, if not let me know and I will try to explain it better.
            I will say one thing here though that I didn't cover in that reply and it is about that we accept the oaths they take as legit. We accept it because most people don't know what the requirements are, we rely on the media to broadcast these oaths and swearing in ceremonies on public television so we believe everything is as should be and that is a mistake on our part for not learning and knowing how our government was designed and should work, and trusting others to tell us the truth.

            $0.00
              Reply
              [-]
               5 years ago 

              Yes, the documentary I watched went into great detail about how the government pays high interest rates to the privately owned Fed and gave some great info on the creation of money by both the Fed and the banks. It didn't specify that the money is created by my signature, but did say that the banks are creating money out of nothing and certainly not lending me the deposits of others. I didn't know that before. I had always thought banks worked by lending out deposits and by investing those same deposits.

              It's crazy that it has managed to stay afloat this long.

              I've tried to do research as to where gold gets its value from, but I haven't found much beyond, "Well, it's rare, but not too rare." Why is it such a valuable metal? It's soft....? I know that our currency used to be based on the gold standard, but I guess I'm at a loss as to how a gold standard would be intrinsically more valuable than a Redwood standard or a Fossil standard. It's just a thing that some people decided was popular and valuable and that belief seems to bolster its value.

              $0.00
                Reply

                Coin Marketplace

                STEEM 0.27
                TRX 0.12
                JST 0.032
                BTC 56858.44
                ETH 2919.14
                USDT 1.00
                SBD 3.60