I suspect there are deeper levers moving those treated on the public stage. Amongst other evidence for this is the radicalization of various susceptible European nations, like UK, Sweden, and Germany, where terrorists are being emplaced to drive nationalism as a response to such depredations.

A European civil war is in the offing. During such a conflict, it is difficult to parse the role of NATO, but I suspect NATO and the US, as well as ASEAN neighbors, will all be on the side of the EU 'national' forces.

What would be the result of such a conflict that decisively crushed national sovereignty movements across Europe? A Fascist neoliberal despotism practically identical to a Fourth Reich, allied with US via NATO, and a profiteering partner with ASEAN countries.

Factions within the cabals are jockeying for position, and the Soros wing is being opposed by this move that will raise different players to the top to rake the cream of profits than HRC would have. However, that's really the only difference between the Trump and Soros factions.

It will make no difference to us, who will be milked either way to supply that cream.

Both factions seek profitable war against Iran. Putin and Xinping seek more profitable--to them--industrial development and commerce with Iran. Certainly the Iranians do. Soros and Trump, however, are both Zionists, and firmly in the Israeli orbit drawn around the power of Israeli technological dominance in corporate surveillance that is the most potent weapon in the world at present.

There is another way this can be decided.

We can undertake to supersede that surveillance with our own. The people can directly possess this most powerful weapon in the world, and we do not need to pretend we are being represented by 'The People' in the form of states, corporations, and the organizations pretending to act on our behalf while actually usurping our direct power and felicity.

I reckon we should take that latter course.

Thanks!