For a good way to redpill people on pizzagate, give em this hypothetical:

Say you saw guys in the hood flash gang signs. And then suppose you happened upon their phone and there was coded drug language, e.g., "snow" etc. Then say you check out their social media and they are making explicit references to drugs, e.g., rolled up dollar bills and talk about getting "wired," etc. Then finally, you see them leaving the house of a known drug king pin.

These people are OBVIOUSLY involved in drugs in some capacity right?!

There is the same level of evidence for pizzagate:

"gang signs" = pedo symbols on Besta Pizza, etc

"coded drug language" = coded pedo language, eg., "pizza-related map" etc.

drug social media posts = pedo social media posts, e.g., "chickenhawk" etc

connection to known drug pin = connections to known pedos and traffickers, e.g., Silsby, Epstein, Hastert

To make no mention of the CP Titus's friend found on Comet website...

Freakin drives me nuts when people say there is "no evidence for pizzagate"...