People Claiming to Do For Another (The State, Walmart, Verizon etc)

What if, when asked a couple questions, people claiming to do for another (The State, Walmart, Verizon etc) would admit/confess NOT being able to do anything for the one they claim things are done for?

Someone says they pulled you over, or are citing you for ..., is that a claim to be doing those things for (the people of) The State of ... or The City of ... etc? What if, upon confirmation that's what's being claimed, one asked "Who told you that (is what's being done, and that's who it's done for)?" Would the response show that the one they're claiming to do things for was the one that told them what to do, and told them that it's done for the one they're claiming it's done for? What if you followed the "who told you that?" question with "when did you and The State of ... last speak?" Could the response show no way for anything to be done for the one they claim things are done for?

There's a little more to this than these two questions, but not much. It's often summed up as "No Claims", but how does one do a 'no'? I believe it's about not making any claims for the self, while bringing to light whether or not there's any substance to what the people you speak with claim.

If you find these ideas interesting, please join us on skype: https://join.skype.com/QUfxKewo6Yrn

Here are the recordings these ideas found on: http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=44889