What if no one is in charge?
There are many politicians who claim to be in charge. There are many conspiracy theories purporting to explain who (or what) is really in charge. But what if this is all an illusion, and no one is in charge? Sure, there are people who demand obedience, and threaten to harm any who refuse to obey, but is that real authority?
There are innumerable circumstances beyond our individual control, and sometimes other people are responsible for creating (or at least influencing) those circumstances, but they are not in charge as a result. It is absurd to attempt to wrest control from someone who does not really have it in the first place. Instead, strive to flow around their obstructions like water around a rock. Govern yourself, because no stranger can do so better.
None of us can rightfully claim authority over others without their consent. Instead, respect others as you would wish them to respect you. Follow the Golden Rule, not rulers or their promises of wealth. If you wish to improve the world, improve yourself. Seek virtue rather than popularity, and those who also seek virtue will find you. We are all disciples and pilgrims, and we can help one another as we pursue the same goals.
The history of philosophy is the history of human pursuit of wisdom and virtue. Taoism and Stoicism may provide a good starting point for your personal growth and self-control. While antiquity does not automatically mean truth, many old ideas have been abandoned merely because they were out of fashion or inconvenient to those who want to be in charge rather than due to any inherent shortcomings. Truth is timeless, and even when only partially grasped, it is worth the pursuit. Easy answers promised by people who want power always ring hollow because they are not built on this foundation of truth, and those who want to be in charge do not hold virtue as their ideal.
Image credit
My son told me we should obey the policemen because the government owns the roads; which is a compelling argument.
They don't actually claim to own the roads, though. They manage them on behalf of the public.
If you wreck your suspension on a pothole you can't sue the government.
Those who believe they're in charge assign themselves all of the benefits of ownership and none of the responsibilities.
The only good reason to obey the police is that they can shoot you with impunity if you don't. The police are not the government; at best they are the government's wage slaves, at worst, their hired thugs.
I find it funny that roads are always the go-to argument on behalf of the State, as if private roads don't exist. In fact, in the bad old days of the railroads, ALL roads were privately owned, at least in the US. I was born in a country where private business wasn't legal until 1988, so my perspective is a little different.
In the US, we had a transcontinental highway network built primarily with private funding long before the federal government took over. I have driven across bridges that were financed privately by the communities that wanted them using (and promptly repaying) capital from local banks.
Government monopolizing a thing and funding its operation through extortion doesn't create authority.
This post was shared in the Curation Collective Discord community for curators, and upvoted and resteemed by the @c-squared community account after manual review.
@c-squared runs a community witness. Please consider using one of your witness votes on us here