You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Gender is not purely biological
It's not really much of a response though is it? Your response is assuming that this one person is the only influence in this area and that all theories lead back to him and his awful experiment. By the same token then if we find any scientific study which suggests gender is sexual only to be conducted by someone of ill-repute then it would refute the whole area of study.
It's also really hard to take your response seriously when you use a hate meme as your channel art :(
I'm saying that the whole basis of your hypothesis was studied from birth only ONCE and it ended with 2 suicides. I'm saying there's no other true study, unless you count that suicide is a popular trend for transexuals. I'm saying the whole idea of gender being a social construct is fundamentally flawed. All you're saying is "Well that's just one study!" without listing out any other studies that prove otherwise and using ad hominem to justify your incorrect statement.
The adhominem is separate and there are plenty of sources listed to support my hypothesis listed in the resources section. Look you don't have to agree but I can tell you my hypothesis has literally 0 to do with that freakshow you wrote about. I appreciate a good argument and constructive discussion. So, if my hypothesis has nothing to do with that guy where do you go from there?
So first, simply saying "it's in this book" isn't good enough proof, list quotes, show statistics. Also to say your hypothesis about gender has nothing to do with the person who created the word and basis for your hypothesis is objectively incorrect.