Philosophy: Logical Fallacies Part I
I want to do a bit different style of posting to encourage everyone to debate and work through arguments in a respectful and logical way.
Today however, I want to talk to you about logical fallacies! There are many and I'd like to go over them as I see a lot of these being committed on social. Remember for your argument to be logical, THOU MUST NOT COMMIT LOGICAL FALLACIES! Instead of just pointlessly copying and pasting, I will describe these in my own words for you, if that isn't your thing, check out the bottom for references. Otherwise, kindly read on...
Ad Hominem Fallacy
This is the fallacy where instead of trying to refute an actual argument or claim by an opponent, you attack their character in some way. This can include but is not limited to their intelligence, appearance, reputation, heritage, etc. This in no means helps an argument or furthers the conversation making it a complete waste of time, unnecessary, and offensive.
The A Priori Argument Fallacy
This is where you start with a pre-set belief or mantra as a fact and then using that authority to justify it in some means. This is primarily seen in theistic debates and reasoning. A great example would be "The bible is 100% true because it says so in the bible itself." Now as great as that would be to believe, you can't make the argument with the argument itself as the evidence.
Ableism Fallacy
This is the absurd belief that because someone is in some way (even just perceived) as lesser that they naturally deserve less and can be freely victimized by those who are smarter, luckier, or have less moral values among other things. Also known as profiteering, vulture capitalism. The reason it's a fallacy is because you can use it to argue absurd points like, because I work more hours than you I deserve better healthcare. Ironically because you work so much, you're stressed and NEED more healthcare so is that really a fair argument? No, that's why it's a fallacy.
Actions Have Consequences Fallacy
This is where a person of authority falsely describes to you a type of imposed punishment as a consequence of someone else's negative act. For example as a child a teacher may have said you'd better sit there and think about what you did because you'll be in big trouble if the consequences of your actions result in further punishment. What does this even mean? Well I'll tell you what it means, it meant that if the issue which was already done with was escalated for whatever reason (probably PR or something) to the principal and then the school board or whomever and they decide more action needs to be taken to look they way they need to look, THEN they act. Realistically though that has nothing to do with you and in real life this can't be used an argument because it holds no validity. If I step on a butterfly I may open a blackhole in 1 million years, but there is no real correlation. It's a false way of creating new rules or "laws" by posing them as inevitable.
The Affective Fallacy
Using emotions or feelings as arguments that are self-validating and immune to criticism. Example: "I feel that you have committed hate speech against me and because you cannot know or tell me how I feel. If I feel it, it must be true."
Now we know this is completely ridiculous, however this fallacy is used more than you think. Another example: "I feel oppressed, there for I am." This is a dangerous and extremely commonly seen fallacy today. It should be obvious that feeling are not facts, nor are they proof or evidence of anything.
There are really so many fallacies! So, I'll do this in a small series as there are actually a HUGE amount and then after I'll do a summary of them all or the most important ones to be aware of. If you don't care about my list, but want some frame of reference...
Check out these 2 resources I like to use and often refer to:
http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/engl1311/fallacies.htm
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/
If you love philosophy as much as I do, feel free to give me a thumbs up and share your thoughts.
If you want to make sure people aren't committing logical fallacies be sure to repost this!
Every Week I Do A Giveaway
For all my posts, I collect the resteems, comments, and upvotes made on my posts the last week and use a https://snackaholic.github.io/steemfortune/en/ by @snackaholic to determine the 3 winners who receive 0.5 SBD each and announce it on the next post! I also send out 0.001 monthly to my followers with a small bulletin update. By following me you opt-in to receiving it!
Last post here: https://steemit.com/giveaway/@scottcbusiness/weekly-post-engagement-giveaways
Affiliate Links
📊 Binance is my favorite place to trade, sign up with my referral - https://www.binance.com/?ref=15520033 - If you haven’t signed up, do so using my referral code 15520033
Earn Free Coins With Minimal Effort
💰 Also be sure to sign up on https://www.mannabase.com/?ref=9d27bc9475 for free payouts every 5 days of their coin $MANNA as part of their nonprofit universal basic income project!
💸 DogeMiner is another free miner that generates you a little bit of Doge constantly. You can invest some doge for a monthly profit based on what you put in! Pretty nifty - https://dogeminer.cc/index.php?boss=216790
Steemers - Steemit Education
✅ Join our @Steemersbot communities to network and grow together with our other Steemers - https://www.facebook.com/groups/Steemers/
Our pinned post has a bunch of resource for you to use and contribute to!
Also join our Discord channel - https://discord.gg/hNMjvBz 📣
We have lists of other servers, upvote bots, promo, discussion, contests, faucets, and everything you can think of!
Social Media And Contact Info
🙌 You can also follow me on:
Twitter - https://twitter.com/Scottcbusiness
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/ScottCBusiness
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/scottcbusiness
LinkedIn - https://ca.linkedin.com/in//scottcbusiness
Steemit - https://steemit.com/@scottcbusiness
Discord - ScottCBusiness#5242
Minds - https://www.minds.com/scottcbusiness
Witnessing On $STEEM
If you believe in me as a witness kindly vote for me by going to https://steemit.com/~witnesses and voting for me at the bottom by typing in my username ‘scottcbusiness’ or click on the link below
Vote for @scottcbusiness
Click the above text to vote for me!
Witness Communications Assembly
An initiative to improve transparency, communications, and overall trust between witnesses and the rest of the community. To start it is a discord server, but we aim to build something much bigger moving forward.
https://discord.gg/3b5jk37
I agree that arguments should be based on their merit, but in reality the character of the interlocutor plays a big part in understanding their views
A huge one and that's why we should be aware of ad hominem among other fallacies
In current paradox thinks about usually to recognize formal and casual misrepresentations. Formal false notions are those promptly observed to be occasions of identifiable invalid sensible structures, for example, undistributed center and denying the predecessor. Albeit huge numbers of the casual paradoxes are additionally invalid contentions, it is for the most part thought to be more productive, from the perspectives of both acknowledgment and comprehension, to uncover their shortcomings through investigations that don't include request to formal dialects. Consequently it has turned into the training to shun the representative dialect of formal rationale in the examination of these false notions; thus the term 'casual misrepresentation' has increased wide cash. In the accompanying exposition, which is in four sections, it is what is viewed as the casual misrepresentation writing that will be evaluated.
Interesting. Yeah I'll be covering all of them over time.