Wow, what a large pile of bullshit!

The doctrine of Moral Relativism is deeply embedded in monetarism as value fluctuates constantly depending on the circumstances. If the market needs billions to be impoverished so be it? What is wrong with this picture? The efficiency of the market? That is why monetarism completely fails to achieve anything worthy, simply because value remains unchanged as the input must always equal the output. -- in a money-free environment.

Are you saying values don't fluctuate? Water isn't more valuable when you are thirsty? Food isn't more valuable when you are hungry? A warm fire isn't more valuable when you are cold?

The free market doesn't need anyone impoverished. The free market doesn't need anyone wealthy. The free market isn't a place. It isn't a certain group of people. It isn't an ideology. The free market is the collection of everyone's individual actions and economic decisions.

The free market has built the computer age and electric age and industrial age and the information age that allows you to bitch about things on the internet.

Money free environments are dog shit backwater edges of civilization hoping to survive another day without starving.

Hmmm, which one is better? So hard to decide.