Poker Tactics: Play Tight
Poker Tactics: Play Tight
Playing tight in poker refers to having a more conservative play style in which you play less frequently, and only go in with the top hands.
It’s key to figure out what type of player your opponent is so you can adapt your play-style and base some of your decisions around this. It’s often advised you play the opposite style to what your opponent plays. For example, if they’re playing tight, you should play loose and vice versa. There are also some stereotypes, such as older men are more likely to play tight as they’re thinking about retirement funds etcetera, whereas young males are often looser in play, making riskier moves on a more frequent basis.
The main advantage to playing tight is that you’re less likely to be stuck in an awkward situation as you only play the best hands and the best positions. This tactic can be especially effective in games without an ante as there’s less of an incentive to play many hands.
Playing tight against a loose player can be useful as you’re likely to win a lot of the head to heads, purely from a statistics standpoint. If you’re only going in with the best hands, and they’re going in with sub-optimal hands, and still raising with them anyway, you can easily get a lot of chips out of them.
It’s always best to mix up your play-style and never be too predictable, the best poker players can switch from playing tight to loose within the same game to keep the opponents guessing.
That being said, playing tight is more suitable to beginner’s in my opinion as it’s a slightly easier play-style.
Feel free to check out the Steem Poker League at @spl for the chance to win SBD in our frequent free-rolls!
If you enjoyed this post, please don’t forget to up-vote, follow and comment! Thank you for taking the time to give it a read and I hope you have a nice day.
Donations:
BTC Address - 1JQGxuVLQf1hAz6i2dpitvGNvkTSKD8xAC
LTC Address - LdHvzzi5ZhZZr9Ce5gek9rgmJXbk78tQD7
ETC Address - 0xae041220e640Ca52BCa8644B178682fC12705cBA
NAV Address - NgQtdkT6kQaYNqEMrhc9ainga3eRv9xzXR
I agree playing tight goes a long way toward keeping out of tricky situations. I think it works even better if playing that style aggressively. I don't know about you but for me playing tight passively is just a receipt for ruin. Made hands are easily beat when rags are allowed to see the flop for the cost of a blind. Keep up the good posts. Will be watching for you on the tables and enjoying your play.
I must admit I do prefer to play relatively tight most of the time, but obviously throw things in now and again to switch it up and remain unpredictable. I just feel safer that way, I agree with the aggressiveness though, I think aggression is pretty important in poker, it's something I notice most of the top players seem to utilize.
Thanks for the comment, yeah I haven't played in a few weeks but would love to find a bit of time to get into it again. Hopefully see you on the table sometime soon :)
Don't get me wrong but I find this advise rather outdated. I mean, sure, playing a TAG game is - most of the times - the way to go, but that doesn't mean "only go in with the top hands".
You should have a set range for specific situations (e.g. position; effective stack; action up to you; players left to act; etc.).
Opening 7s8s from the BU, when the action is folded to you, is not exactly going in with a "top hand" but it certainly would be a very advisable play, much better than folding or simply limping in.
On the other hand, GII after you've raised QQ, was met by a reraise and an all in shove for 300BB effective, is not a really good idea, even though QQ is a premium hand.
Also, I find it rather unuseful to categorize people as TAG/LAG. I find it better to understand their ranges (and our perceived ranges to them) and notice how these ranges play and how they connect to specific boards. If you simply think "he's LAG, I'll play TAG", you'd miss out on plenty of information you could use to your advantage.
For instance, if a player is raising 60% of his hands preflop, you can assume he's playing 22+, A2+, K2+, Q3+, J7+, T8+, 98+, suited connectors, two gapped suited connectors, and most suited combinations. You can reraise to isolate him with a range that includes 22+, suited connectors and all broadways and still have close to 60% equity against his range.
With this, you can actually even further pin down his range, depending on his action. He might be a player that would: reraise JJ+, AJs+, KQs, AQ+,; flat 22-TT and suited connectors; and fold all rags. So now you go into the flop with more information to better navigate your play depending on the board's texture.
So say we have AhTh in the BU. Villain is HJ, effective stack is 150BB. Action folds to the Villain, who raises to a standard 3BB. We have a nice hand with 62.25% equity against Villain's range.
We put in a raise, making it 11BB to go. Action folds back to Villain who simply calls.
Flop comes KsQd3h. So we have a backdoor flush draw, a gutshot and a flop that hits our range way better than it hits Villain's range. The only hands that are in his range that could realistically hit that flop are KQo, QJs, 33 and maybe TJ for a double-ended.
If villain bets, we can call and reassess. If villain checks, we can either bet and take the pot down (dead money) or check, since we fold most of his range we already have beat, we only get calls from QJ and TJ and probably get reraised by KQ and 33.
Anyway, that was just an illustration of how thinking in ranges can work to your advantage.
Thanks for your input.
Whilst I agree with you with most of your points, bear in mind my post does generalize to an extent as it is aimed towards new players and this post is specifically talking about "Tight Players", it's the whole essence of the article.
Tight players will generally play the more premium hands, albeit with some exceptions depending on the situation at hand, but for the most part it can be explained this way.
As expressed in the latter part of the article, I do express that, I myself don't stick to a certain stereotype and ensure to mix it up to remain unpredictable. This goes hand in hand with the concept that it's not always beneficial to think in such a close-minded manner and I would endorse thinking more from a range POV as you become more experienced.
The topics of range, positioning etc. will be covered in other articles, this was meant to provide an overview of the tight play style in particular, without an emphasis on other poker strategies.
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by nathan290595 from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.