Is it sensible to seek a "middle ground" with those who peddle hatred or scientific ignorance?
Is it not understandable to have protests when the candidate who lost the popular vote gets still elected?
Is it sensible to seek a "middle ground" with those who peddle hatred or scientific ignorance?
Is it not understandable to have protests when the candidate who lost the popular vote gets still elected?
I think you're kinda missing the point though,.but We can always agree to disagree on this one. If we simply rule out the opinions of others as 'peddling hatred' or 'scientific ignorance', while forgetting that they represent millions of like minds, then it'll always be a bitter row of me against you with the winner being the one willing to go to extremes.
About Trump all am saying is that there were rules guiding the process, and a democratic process meant accepting of those rules no matter the results.
This wasn't meant to be about Trump; sorry if it felt that way. I'm just curious as to our democratic evolution with increasing polarizations