You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why is the Government Media not Reporting About the White Genocide in South Africa?

in #politics6 years ago

There is always strife. The black/white or other combinations of contention will always exist. But they are not exclusive.

In South African history we also have times where Whites + Blacks fought against Whites + Blacks or Asians even... In that wonderful hidden war that was not being officially recognized by the UN at the time, even though they were watching.

Meanwhile they were shaming white South Africans about "apartheid", which was not even a convention invented by the locals. But that would be digressing.

My point is that there has been cases of blacks and whites working well together, there were still healthy boundaries between them, but they worked and fought to a common goal and had common enemies. The enemy united them for that time.

I am not saying that this shows hope. All over history two enemies have allied together to take on a third faction. That they are black or white or whatever does not change the fact that everything is based on competing. It did not start when Europe colonized Africa. It began way before that where whites took on whites all the time.

When they rolled out from there and applied their same conquering habits to others they rolled over them roughshod - they won.

What is crazy today is the "win-shaming" that has happened in the world. This is actually a pretty good phrase to explain it... I think I should I need to make a post about that... A hundred years ago the winner of a war celebrated victory. Today the winner is reviled of "oppressing" others and is almost forced to make amends for winning.

Next up, Gold medal winners at the Olympics need to give money to the losers of that division.

Sort:  

What always nullifies all this crap is that the black people didn't even start farming even when there was no white folk there.

At least that is what I have read. But that doesn't make sense right? I cannot believe they didn't do any agriculture down there.

You are correct. Majority of South Africa was not even settled by the black by the time that whites got there. Only Kwazulu-Natal was occupied by blacks.

I think they did not need to do much farming because natural food was plentiful. I think that Europeans advanced quickly because of constantly needing to fight and outsmart natural hazards and each other.

That aside an even worse realization: That whatever farms they take back stop being farms.

Have a look at Zimbabwe. They chased away or killed their white farmers. Then they starved. Recently they got a new president and this president asked for the white farmers to returned. The black population is overjoyed. Here comes jobs, opportunity and most importantly: food.

Smart humans will acknowledge those who are experts in their field.

Have a look at Zimbabwe. They chased away or killed their white farmers. Then they starved. Recently they got a new president and this president asked for the white farmers to returned. The black population is overjoyed. Here comes jobs, opportunity and most importantly: food.

Smart humans will acknowledge those who are experts in their field.

Perfect answer bro.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64241.02
ETH 3178.09
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.85