RE: Unravelling The Malthusian Nightmare
I don´t agree with you...But you made your point...And left the question in open...But in reality the average person is a savage that just looks for pleasure and not ilumination...The average joe is selfish and doesn´t have even reason to sacrifice himself for a higher purpose...He can´t even say the word metafisics, cause he is watching footbal...Once upon a time i was like you, before undestanding the iniciation and misteries you are diving in...In fact, most people don´even khow to use a condom, and they don´t care about maitaining universal balance with nature. What you are saying is that we all shall be led, by monkeys...And everything would be fine...Like africans that say, "send me food, look at children dying", when don´t even know how many children they have or their names, they don´t have social values, "save the tribal people"...Go to africa make the revolution like Che Guevara... And you are the guy who is sacrificed by your evolved consciness when those barbaric monkeys won´t even think twice before selling you to a organ factory in exchange of a coca-cola...The world must be ruled by reason of a intelectual society...Just as natural laws manifest itself throw geomtry...Only 1% of world population achieve the connections with other reality and worlds...99% is cattle wacthin TV...It is the way god designed us...Other way it would colapse...And we all can be happy forever and ever in the savana with the lions without toilet paper..You must figth to survive, you must learn to achieve, you must give to receive..You must sacrifice yourself to have the rigth. What happens when we help those retarded creatures? They bite you in the hand...They have no values...Just wasted organic matter...They murdered Christ, and go to church looking mundane salvation...
He can´t even say the word metafisics,
Odd...my spell checker indicates the spelling is metaphysics.
Physician..heal thyself.
My native language is not English. But we can keep up looking for appearences.
Steemit has a spell checker. the leeetle red mark under the word is a hint.
the word 'metaphysics'
abstract theory with no basis in reality.
let me repeat. It has no basis in reality.
in other words it's just wanking, as the brits might say.
Reality is. The method to learn more about it is the scientific method.
Perhaps you might have heard of it?
I thought not.
It's the basis for the technology that allows you to sit around and criticize everyone else and feel smugly superior.
That's your right of course.
I studied many of the ciences...And i tend to consider myself as a cientific man...Then came a time when cience became predictable and something happened, i couldn´t explain some conections that i was experiencing...But they are real...Tradicional thinkin couldn´t explain the conclusions and events my cientific mind was receiving...It´s was impossible...I confess i had a cognitive dissonance...And it was the worts time of my life...My brain wasn´t perceiving anything as it should...But some ligth was shed in those hard times...And the conections of all what was said and happend made sense...Cience couldn´t explain it...I couldn´t...But it was real to the point that this reality was in fact a perceive ilusion...
Of course we have a notion of ego and we compare with others...If i feel superior is because i am reflecting the same action of the inferior beings act when they see you as superior...And what o they do!? They attack...That´s what this text is about...Why should we protect disguised sheep that are in fact bloodsucking creatures...So what i trying so say, cause i love games, attacking a man who is worried about human salvation in racional thinking is a bad as having in notion most people don´t even care about it...Superior/inferior...What is above is equal to whom is below...
Resuming...Hating Maltsuvian for his ideas and actions is the same as hating basic people...
everything is dual...but poles are the same in features...Just as extrem left is equal to extreme rigth...
And dont´forget Malthusian was doing "cience"...
Actually it's you that's wrong and his name was Malthus- the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus and he wasn't doing science by his own admission. The part of his essay I left out was his belief that human beings are endowed by their creator with an innate spiritual sense that would preclude overpopulation. The rest of your "critique" isn't even worth bothering with.
He is righ if he is talking about Muslims...
and your point?
spelling changes over hundreds of years.
what's your excuse?