You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Book Review. Killing The Deep State: The Fight To Save President Trump
One should be extremely careful in labeling something a conspiracy. For one business is conducted as a conspiracy to make a profit. More importantly that is also how de facto conspiracy corporations operate. Another thing is that any time two people meet with no others present there is evidence of a conspiracy. Conspiracies are not illegal nor are they unlawful unless the conspiracy specifically is to perform some unlawful or illegal act.
“Conspiracy Theory”: Foundations of a Weaponized Term"
http://www.globalresearch.ca/conspiracy-theory-foundations-of-a-weaponized-term/5319708
Fair enough, that's good criticism. I broadly use that term in the review and loosely without specific context. Thanks, I'll keep that in mind! I did research a lot of assertions in this book and they are either false or extremely misleading or exaggerated. Weaponized term, I do agree.
Most books are slanted. For me it is easier to take basic information about subjects and determine how a situation fits into the matrix. So I take Law Dictionary's and the descriptions in them and determine whether or not something fits the description. I take finance law and determine what is happening based on their own description. Another way is to take the basic rules of design or construction and determine based on the description what caused a bridge to collapse. So it is subject dependent, but work s well for me.
As a result I am no longer surprised that people think weird stuff about a lot of things. They are usually asking someone to tell them what happens and a lot of the time they are asking the criminal or the faulted party to tell on themselves. Which isn't going to happen in most cases. You can however discover truth if you go to the very basic of just about any subject. For instance Law is dependent upon the basic rules of reading and writing. They always without fail will apply. So if you are getting data or information that contradicts those very basic rules of reading or writing it is the data that is faulty. A long comment. Sorry. lol